Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
ISTM vs SIL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ISTM returned +18.3% to SIL's +27.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ISTM and SIL
Net assets: $28m on Nov 4, 2026 for iShares Strategic Metals ETF, and $4.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Silver Miners ETF.
1% of ISTM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 99% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
0% of SIL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
Pair scorecard
ISTM costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.8 points; SIL is far larger, $4.4bn against $27m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ISTM | SIL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +18.3% | +27.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 22.6%, high on Jan 29, 2026 | 33.7%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Rare earth and critical materials | Silver miners |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.0% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 12.1 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.65% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $27m | $4.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ISTM and SIL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ISTM | SIL | ISTM | SIL |
| 3 months | −8.4% | −6.8% | not measured | −5.5 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | −12.6% | −17.4% | not measured | −20.0 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | +18.3% | +27.1% | not measured | +12.1 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | +68.3% | +223.9% | not measured | +146.3 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: ISTM Sep 2023 · SIL Apr 2010 | +66.9% | +110.6% | not measured | −282.3 pts vs ACWI |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
ISTM
By weight, 1% of ISTM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 11% of the fund across 86 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +18.3% with distributions reinvested. It sits 22.6% below its all-time high of Jan 29, 2026.
SIL
By weight, 0% of SIL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 76% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 12.1 pts. It sits 33.7% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do ISTM and SIL hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ISTM against SIL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/istm-vs-sil
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). ISTM against SIL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/istm-vs-sil
[ISTM against SIL (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/istm-vs-sil)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.