Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

ISTM vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ISTM returned +18.3% to SLVP's +31.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ISTM and SLVP

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $28m for iShares Strategic Metals ETF and $799m for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF.

At a glance
0.9%
ISTM in the S&P 500
5.3%
SLVP in the S&P 500
+18.3%
ISTM total return, 1 year
+31.0%
SLVP total return, 1 year
ISTM · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 99% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
99% of its weight is outside the S&P 5001% of ISTM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 99% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.1%99%1% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 11% of the fund · 86 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in99% of its weight is outside the S&P 5001% of ISTM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 99% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.1%99%1% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

1% of ISTM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 99% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

SLVP · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 95% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
95% of its weight is outside the S&P 5005% of SLVP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.5%95%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 72% of the fund · 37 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in95% of its weight is outside the S&P 5005% of SLVP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.5%95%5% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

5% of SLVP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

SLVP costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.7 points; SLVP is far larger, $799m against $28m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ISTM vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureISTMSLVP
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.3%+31.0%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high22.6%, high on Jan 29, 202633.0%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksRare earth and critical materialsSilver miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 16.0 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.47%0.39%
Net assets$28m$799m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

Risk and return

Oct 6, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026 · 160 weekly returns
ISTM SLVP
Return
Total return edge SLVP +68.7% +259.4%
Annualized edge SLVP +18.5% +51.6%
Price return edge SLVP +11.7% +246.0%
Risk
Volatility edge ISTM 22.3% 49.4%
Max drawdown edge ISTM −18.9% −38.8%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SLVP 0.67 1.00
Sortino edge SLVP 0.97 1.64
Calmar edge SLVP 0.98 1.33
Reading

From Oct 2023 to Oct 2026, SLVP returned more: +259.4% to +68.7%. ISTM swung less: 22.3% to 49.4%. ISTM fell less at its worst: −18.9% to −38.8%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: ISTM vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureISTMSLVPEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+68.7%+259.4%SLVPPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.5%+51.6%SLVPTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+11.7%+246.0%SLVPPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.3%49.4%ISTMSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.5%30.1%ISTMLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.9%−38.8%ISTMDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.671.00SLVPReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.971.64SLVPReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.981.33SLVPAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 160 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, ISTM and SLVP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ISTM SLVP
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ISTM
CRH AMERICA FINANCE INC 144A 1.89%
DTE ELECTRIC CO 1.13%
COLUMBIA FUNDING COMPANY LLC 144A 1.09%
GLENCOVE FUNDING LLC 144A 1.09%
OMERS FINANCE TRUST 144A 1.09%
SHINHAN BANK NEW YORK 144A 1.06%
BUNGE LTD FINANCE CORP 144A 0.98%
ASB BANK LIMITED 144A 0.97%
Only in SLVP
HECLA MINING 13.56%
INDUST PENOLES 11.08%
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER 10.21%
FRESNILLO PLC 8.30%
NEWMONT 5.32%
AYA GOLD & SILVER INC 5.25%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES 4.99%
DISCOVERY MINING LTD 4.85%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: ISTM vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowISTMSLVPISTMSLVP
3 months−8.4%−6.8%not measured−5.5 pts vs ACWI
6 months−12.6%−14.7%not measured−17.3 pts vs ACWI
1 year+18.3%+31.0%not measured+16.0 pts vs ACWI
3 years+68.3%+257.6%not measured+180.0 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: ISTM Sep 2023 · SLVP Feb 2012+66.9%+53.4%not measured−314.3 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

ISTM iShares Strategic Metals ETF · Holds 86 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 1% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF · Holds 37 stocks in silver miners, 5% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Rare earth and critical materials Silver miners
In the S&P 500 0.9% 5.3%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 99.8%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 86 37
Top ten, share of the fund 11.2% 72.1%
Expense ratio 0.47% 0.39%
Fee for the differing part 0.47% 0.39%
Total return, 1 year +18.3% +31.0%
vs its benchmark not measured +16.0 pts vs ACWI
Below its high −22.6% −33.0%
Net assets $28m $799m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

ISTM and SLVP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ISTM

By weight, 1% of ISTM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 11% of the fund across 86 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +18.3% with distributions reinvested. It sits 22.6% below its all-time high of Jan 29, 2026.

SLVP

By weight, 5% of SLVP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 72% of the fund across 37 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 16.0 pts. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do ISTM and SLVP hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ISTM or SLVP?
ISTM has 1% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SLVP has 5%, so ISTM differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, ISTM or SLVP?
ISTM charges 0.47% a year and SLVP charges 0.39%, so SLVP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ISTM against SLVP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/istm-vs-slvp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.