Do REMX and SLVP hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, REMX or SLVP?

REMX has 9% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SLVP has 5%, so REMX differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, REMX or SLVP?

REMX charges 0.53% a year and SLVP charges 0.39%, so SLVP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

REMX vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, REMX returned −17.8% to SLVP's +31.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about REMX and SLVP

Net assets: $1.4bn on Nov 3, 2026 for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF, and $799m on Nov 4, 2026 for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF.

REMX on its own →SLVP on its own →

At a glance

8.7%

REMX in the S&P 500

5.3%

SLVP in the S&P 500

−17.8%

REMX total return, 1 year

+31.0%

SLVP total return, 1 year

REMX · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 91% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

9% of REMX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.

SLVP · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 95% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

5% of SLVP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

SLVP costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 48.8 points; REMX is 1.9 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

REMX vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	REMX	SLVP
Return
Measure	REMX	SLVP
Total return, 1 year	−17.8%	+31.0%
Drawdown
Measure	REMX	SLVP
Below its all-time high	76.3%, high on Apr 11, 2011	33.0%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	REMX	SLVP
What it tracks	Rare earth and critical materials	Silver miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+15.0%	+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	behind by 32.8 pts	ahead by 16.0 pts
Cost and size
Measure	REMX	SLVP
Expense ratio	0.53%	0.39%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$1.4bn	$727m
Holdings
Measure	REMX	SLVP
Holdings in common	0%

Method

Risk and return

Feb 10, 2012 to Oct 30, 2026 · 768 weekly returns · each against ACWI

REMX SLVP

Return

Total return edge SLVP −65.7% +45.6%

Annualized edge SLVP −7.0% +2.6%

Price return edge SLVP −76.8% +17.2%

Risk

Volatility edge REMX 34.6% 41.1%

Max drawdown edge SLVP (slight) −84.3% −79.5%

Downside capture 134.5% 95.0%

Beta 1.40 0.96

Risk-adjusted

Sharpe edge SLVP −0.09 0.23

Sortino edge SLVP −0.13 0.33

Treynor −0.022 0.097

Calmar edge SLVP −0.08 0.03

Against the benchmark

Alpha −16.7% a year 0.0% a year

Alpha t-stat −2.34 0.00

Information ratio −0.46 −0.01

Tracking error 27.9% 38.4%

Reading

From Feb 2012 to Oct 2026, SLVP returned more: +45.6% to −65.7%. REMX swung less: 34.6% to 41.1%. SLVP fell slightly less at its worst: −79.5% to −84.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: REMX vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	REMX	SLVP	ACWI	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	−65.7%	+45.6%		SLVP	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized	−7.0%	+2.6%		SLVP	Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return	−76.8%	+17.2%		SLVP	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility	34.6%	41.1%		REMX	Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation	23.8%	28.2%		REMX	Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown	−84.3%	−79.5%		SLVP (slight)	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture	122.2%	69.7%	100.0%	REMX	Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture	134.5%	95.0%	100.0%	SLVP	Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta	1.40	0.96	1.00	SLVP lower	How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared	0.38	0.13	1.00	Not an edge	Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe	−0.09	0.23		SLVP	Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino	−0.13	0.33		SLVP	Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor	−0.022	0.097	0.098	SLVP	Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar	−0.08	0.03		SLVP	Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
Benchmark	ACWI	ACWI	ACWI		The ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha	−16.7% a year	0.0% a year	0.0%	REMX significant	Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat	−2.34	0.00		Not an edge	How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range	−30.6% to −2.7%	−19.7% to +19.7%		SLVP's includes zero	The 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio	−0.46	−0.01		SLVP	Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error	27.9%	38.4%	0.0%	Not an edge	How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 768 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, REMX and SLVP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first REMX SLVP

Only in one fund ↓

Only in REMX

Albemarle Corp 8.70%

Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile Sa 8.64%

China Northern Rare Earth Group High-Te 7.69%

Mp Materials Corp 6.88%

Lynas Rare Earths Ltd 6.74%

Pilbara Minerals Ltd 5.36%

Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co Ltd 5.14%

Xiamen Tungsten Co Ltd 4.61%

Only in SLVP

HECLA MINING 13.56%

INDUST PENOLES 11.08%

FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER 10.21%

FRESNILLO PLC 8.30%

NEWMONT 5.32%

AYA GOLD & SILVER INC 5.25%

AGNICO EAGLE MINES 4.99%

DISCOVERY MINING LTD 4.85%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: REMX vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	REMX	SLVP	REMX	SLVP
3 months	−28.6%	−6.8%	−27.3 pts vs ACWI	−5.5 pts vs ACWI
6 months	−52.6%	−14.7%	−55.2 pts vs ACWI	−17.3 pts vs ACWI
1 year	−17.8%	+31.0%	−32.8 pts vs ACWI	+16.0 pts vs ACWI
3 years	−9.2%	+257.6%	−86.8 pts vs ACWI	+180.0 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: REMX Oct 2010 · SLVP Feb 2012	−65.3%	+53.4%	−453.0 pts vs ACWI	−314.3 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF · Holds 32 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF · Holds 37 stocks in silver miners, 5% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer VanEck iShares

Theme Rare earth and critical materials Silver miners

In the S&P 500 8.7% 5.3%

Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 99.8%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%

Holdings 32 37

Top ten, share of the fund 61.9% 72.1%

Expense ratio 0.53% 0.39%

Fee for the differing part 0.53% 0.39%

Total return, 1 year −17.8% +31.0%

vs its benchmark −32.8 pts vs ACWI +16.0 pts vs ACWI

Below its high −76.3% −33.0%

Net assets, REMX as of Nov 3, 2026 and SLVP as of Nov 4, 2026 $1.4bn $799m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

REMX

By weight, 9% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 32 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −17.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 32.8 pts. It sits 76.3% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.

SLVP

By weight, 5% of SLVP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 72% of the fund across 37 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 16.0 pts. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do REMX and SLVP hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, REMX or SLVP?: REMX has 9% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SLVP has 5%, so REMX differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, REMX or SLVP?: REMX charges 0.53% a year and SLVP charges 0.39%, so SLVP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

REMX vs SILJ REMX vs SIL REMX vs AGMI REMX vs SETM SLVP vs SETM SLVP vs REXC SLVP vs EART SLVP vs WDIG

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →REMX on its own →SLVP on its own →REMX dividend history →REMX holdings →SLVP dividend history →SLVP holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

REMX filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

REMX prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

VanEck website ↗

SLVP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SLVP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for SLVP ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, REMX against SLVP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/remx-vs-slvp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.