Do SETM and SLVP hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, SETM or SLVP?

SETM has 9% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SLVP has 5%, so SETM differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, SETM or SLVP?

SETM charges 0.65% a year and SLVP charges 0.39%, so SLVP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

SETM vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SETM returned +3.9% to SLVP's +31.0%; 13% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SETM and SLVP

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $421m for Sprott Critical Materials ETF and $799m for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF.

SETM on its own →SLVP on its own →

At a glance

9.1%

SETM in the S&P 500

5.3%

SLVP in the S&P 500

+3.9%

SETM total return, 1 year

+31.0%

SLVP total return, 1 year

SETM · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 91% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

9% of SETM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

SLVP · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 95% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

5% of SLVP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

SLVP costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 27.1 points; SLVP is 1.9 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

SETM vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	SETM	SLVP
Return
Measure	SETM	SLVP
Total return, 1 year	+3.9%	+31.0%
Drawdown
Measure	SETM	SLVP
Below its all-time high	37.4%, high on Jan 28, 2026	33.0%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	SETM	SLVP
What it tracks	Rare earth and critical materials	Silver miners
Against the S&P 500, 1 year	behind by 10.9 pts
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+14.8%	+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	behind by 10.9 pts	ahead by 16.0 pts
Cost and size
Measure	SETM	SLVP
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.39%
Net assets	$421m	$799m
Holdings
Measure	SETM	SLVP
Holdings in common	13%

Method

Risk and return

Feb 10, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026 · 194 weekly returns

SETM SLVP

Return

Total return edge SLVP +34.3% +190.7%

Annualized edge SLVP +8.2% +33.1%

Price return edge SLVP +26.5% +178.7%

Risk

Volatility edge SETM 36.2% 47.3%

Max drawdown edge Tie −39.0% −38.8%

Downside capture 129.3% 95.0%

Beta 1.48 0.96

Risk-adjusted

Sharpe edge SLVP 0.27 0.74

Sortino edge SLVP 0.39 1.20

Treynor 0.067 0.097

Calmar edge SLVP 0.21 0.85

Against the benchmark

Alpha −11.2% a year 0.0% a year

Alpha t-stat −0.71 0.00

Information ratio −0.14 −0.01

Tracking error 30.6% 38.4%

Each against its own benchmark: SETM against VOO, Feb 10, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026; SLVP against ACWI, Feb 10, 2012 to Oct 30, 2026.

Reading

From Feb 2023 to Oct 2026, SLVP returned more: +190.7% to +34.3%. SETM swung less: 36.2% to 47.3%. SETM and SLVP fell about the same at their worst: −39.0% and −38.8%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: SETM vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	SETM	SLVP	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	+34.3%	+190.7%	SLVP	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized	+8.2%	+33.1%	SLVP	Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return	+26.5%	+178.7%	SLVP	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility	36.2%	47.3%	SETM	Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation	25.6%	29.2%	SETM	Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown	−39.0%	−38.8%	Tie	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture	116.9%	69.7%		Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture	129.3%	95.0%		Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta	1.48	0.96	Not an edge	How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared	0.32	0.13	Not an edge	Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe	0.27	0.74	SLVP	Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino	0.39	1.20	SLVP	Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor	0.067	0.097		Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar	0.21	0.85	SLVP	Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
Benchmark	VOO	ACWI		The ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha	−11.2% a year	0.0% a year	Not significant	Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat	−0.71	0.00	Not an edge	How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range	−42.0% to +19.7%	−19.7% to +19.7%	Includes zero	The 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio	−0.14	−0.01		Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error	30.6%	38.4%	Not an edge	How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 194 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

13%

By the books each fund has filed, SETM and SLVP hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

13% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first SETM SLVP

Hecla Mining Co. 3.42% 13.56%

First Majestic Silver Corp. 3.33% 10.21%

Aya Gold & Silver Inc. 2.79% 5.25%

Silvercorp Metals Inc. 0.97% 3.21%

Endeavour Silver Corp. 0.95% 3.79%

Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. 0.46% 1.26%

GoGold Resources Inc. 0.42% 1.86%

Vizsla Silver Corp. 0.41% 1.54%

Highlander Silver Corp. 0.24% 0.90%

New Pacific Metals Corp. 0.21% 0.85%

Andean Precious Metals Corp. 0.09% 0.40%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in SETM

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 5.47%

Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. 4.87%

Cameco Corp. 4.81%

NAC Kazatomprom JSC 4.15%

Teck Resources Ltd. 3.95%

Albemarle Corp. 3.61%

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA 3.40%

PLS Group Ltd. 3.12%

Only in SLVP

INDUST PENOLES 11.08%

FRESNILLO PLC 8.30%

NEWMONT 5.32%

AGNICO EAGLE MINES 4.99%

DISCOVERY MINING LTD 4.85%

WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS 4.78%

KINROSS GOLD 2.44%

COEUR MINING 1.64%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: SETM vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	SETM	SLVP	SETM	SLVP
3 months	−21.2%	−6.8%	−21.1 pts vs VOO	−5.5 pts vs ACWI
6 months	−35.3%	−14.7%	−40.3 pts vs VOO	−17.3 pts vs ACWI
1 year	+3.9%	+31.0%	−10.9 pts vs VOO	+16.0 pts vs ACWI
3 years	+57.7%	+257.6%	−25.6 pts vs VOO	+180.0 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: SETM Feb 2023 · SLVP Feb 2012	+29.5%	+53.4%	−64.0 pts vs VOO	−314.3 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF · Holds 156 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF · Holds 37 stocks in silver miners, 5% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Sprott iShares

Theme Rare earth and critical materials Silver miners

In the S&P 500 9.1% 5.3%

Active share vs the S&P 500 99.8% 99.8%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%

Holdings 156 37

Top ten, share of the fund 40.1% 72.1%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.39%

Fee for the differing part 0.65% 0.39%

Total return, 1 year +3.9% +31.0%

vs its benchmark −10.9 pts vs VOO +16.0 pts vs ACWI

Below its high −37.4% −33.0%

Net assets $421m $799m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

13% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

SETM

By weight, 9% of SETM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 156 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.9% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Total Return Index, so a holder was behind by 10.9 pts. It sits 37.4% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

SLVP

By weight, 5% of SLVP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 72% of the fund across 37 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 16.0 pts. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do SETM and SLVP hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, SETM or SLVP?: SETM has 9% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SLVP has 5%, so SETM differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, SETM or SLVP?: SETM charges 0.65% a year and SLVP charges 0.39%, so SLVP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

SETM vs SILJ SETM vs SIL SETM vs AGMI SETM vs METL SLVP vs REMX SLVP vs WDIG SLVP vs EART SLVP vs FMTL

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →SETM on its own →SLVP on its own →SETM dividend history →SETM holdings →SLVP dividend history →SLVP holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

SETM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SETM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Sprott page for SETM ↗

SLVP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SLVP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for SLVP ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SETM against SLVP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/setm-vs-slvp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.