Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
METL vs SETM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, METL returned +6.9% to SETM's +3.9%; 39% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about METL and SETMNet assets on Nov 4, 2026: $66m for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF and $421m for Sprott Critical Materials ETF.
14% of METL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 86% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
9% of SETM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
Pair scorecard
SETM costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.0 points; SETM is 6.4 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | METL | SETM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +6.9% | +3.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 33.0%, high on Jan 28, 2026 | 37.4%, high on Jan 28, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Miners and metals | Rare earth and critical materials |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 7.9 pts | behind by 10.9 pts |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.8% | +14.8% |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 7.9 pts | behind by 10.9 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 0.65% |
| Net assets | $66m | $421m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 39% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, METL and SETM hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.
half
39% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | METL | SETM | METL | SETM |
| 3 months | −16.2% | −21.2% | −16.1 pts vs VOO | −21.1 pts vs VOO |
| 6 months | −26.0% | −35.3% | −31.0 pts vs VOO | −40.3 pts vs VOO |
| 1 year | +6.9% | +3.9% | −7.9 pts vs VOO | −10.9 pts vs VOO |
| 3 years | – | +57.7% | – | −25.6 pts vs VOO |
| Since launchNot the same days: METL Sep 2025 · SETM Feb 2023 | +12.3% | +29.5% | −6.9 pts vs VOO | −64.0 pts vs VOO |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
39% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
METL
By weight, 14% of METL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +6.9% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Total Return Index, so a holder was behind by 7.9 pts. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.
SETM
By weight, 9% of SETM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 156 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.9% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Total Return Index, so a holder was behind by 10.9 pts. It sits 37.4% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do METL and SETM hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 39% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, METL against SETM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/metl-vs-setm
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). METL against SETM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/metl-vs-setm
[METL against SETM (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/metl-vs-setm)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.