Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

NIKL vs SETM: which is really different?

NIKL and SETM hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and SETM returned more over the year.

Sprott Nickel Miners ETF and Sprott Critical Materials ETF.

0.0%NIKL in the S&P 500
8.4%SETM in the S&P 500
+10.8%NIKL total return, 1 year
+37.9%SETM total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Off-Index Score: NIKL scores higher

How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

NIKL 91.8SETM 77.70.1, the lowest in this set91.8, the highest

A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

NIKL100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 74% of the fund · 26 holdings filed Sep 18, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 74% of the fund
SETM92% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
8%92%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 39% of the fund · 156 holdings filed Sep 18, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in8%92%8% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 39% of the fund

5% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NIKL and SETM hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions NIKL and SETM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingNIKLSETM
IGO Ltd.8.25%1.87%
Sunrise Energy Metals Ltd.4.24%0.67%
ANTAM Persero Tbk PT14.86%0.48%
Talon Metals Corp.6.48%0.47%
Nickel Industries Ltd.11.93%0.38%
Merdeka Battery Materials Tbk PT11.52%0.37%
Vale Indonesia Tbk PT4.75%0.37%
Nickel Asia Corp.3.74%0.14%
Trimegah Bangun Persada Tbk PT4.62%0.14%
Xinjiang Xinxin Mining Industry Co. Ltd.2.99%0.10%
Magna Mining Inc.3.98%0.08%
Canada Nickel Co. Inc.3.25%0.07%
Only in each
Only in NIKLOnly in SETM
Centaurus Metals Ltd. 2.11%Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 5.00%
Global Ferronickel Holdings Inc. 1.58%Cameco Corp. 4.91%
Sherritt International Corp. 1.55%Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. 4.73%
First Atlantic Nickel & Cobalt Corp. 1.21%PLS Group Ltd. 4.05%
Central Omega Resources Tbk PT 1.14%NAC Kazatomprom JSC 3.57%
Homeland Nickel Inc. 1.11%Hecla Mining Co. 3.46%
Chalice Mining Ltd. 0.88%First Majestic Silver Corp. 3.42%
Ardea Resources Ltd. 0.86%Albemarle Corp. 3.37%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

NIKL and SETM over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
NIKLSETMNIKLSETMNIKLSETM
3 months+0.7%−9.0%−1.6 pts−11.3 pts+3.1 pts−6.5 pts
6 months−1.4%+5.4%−19.4 pts−12.6 pts−25.6 pts−18.8 pts
1 year+10.8%+37.9%−5.8 pts+21.4 pts−11.0 pts+16.2 pts
3 years−7.1%+82.1%−85.5 pts+3.7 pts−105.3 pts−16.1 pts
Since launch−12.2%+61.6%−115.1 pts−30.1 pts−152.3 pts−74.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
NIKL and SETM on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
Holds 26 stocks in miners and metals, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
Holds 156 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
IssuerSprottSprott
ThemeMiners and metalsRare earth and critical materials
In the S&P 5000.0%8.4%
Active share vs the S&P 500100.0%99.8%
In the Nasdaq-1000.0%0.0%
Holdings26156
Top ten, share of the fund74.4%39.0%
Expense ratio0.75%0.65%
Fee for the differing part0.75%0.65%
Total return, 1 year+10.8%+37.9%
vs the S&P 500−5.8 pts+21.4 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100−11.0 pts+16.2 pts
Below its high−30.3%−21.8%
Net assets$57m$568m

NIKL in plain words

By weight, 0% of NIKL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 74% of the fund across 26 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +10.8% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.8 pts. It sits 30.3% below its all-time high of Jan 26, 2026.

SETM in plain words

By weight, 8% of SETM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 39% of the fund across 156 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +37.9% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 21.4 pts. It sits 21.8% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do NIKL and SETM hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, NIKL or SETM?
NIKL has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SETM has 8%, so NIKL differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, NIKL or SETM?
NIKL charges 0.75% a year and SETM charges 0.65%, so SETM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NIKL against SETM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NIKL against SETM, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nikl-vs-setm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources