Data as of .
NIKL vs REXC: which is really different?
NIKL and REXC hold 4% of their weight in the same names.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: NIKL scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
4% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, NIKL and REXC hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | NIKL | REXC |
|---|---|---|
| Sunrise Energy Metals Ltd. | 4.24% | 6.05% |
| Only in NIKL | Only in REXC |
|---|---|
| ANTAM Persero Tbk PT 14.86% | Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. 19.82% |
| Nickel Industries Ltd. 11.93% | MP Materials Corp. 19.11% |
| Merdeka Battery Materials Tbk PT 11.52% | USA Rare Earth Inc. 6.23% |
| IGO Ltd. 8.25% | Neo Performance Materials Inc. 5.00% |
| Talon Metals Corp. 6.48% | Iluka Resources Ltd. 4.62% |
| Vale Indonesia Tbk PT 4.75% | Arafura Rare Earths Ltd. 4.04% |
| Trimegah Bangun Persada Tbk PT 4.62% | Lindian Resources Ltd. 3.85% |
| Magna Mining Inc. 3.98% | Critical Metals Corp. 3.45% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIKL | REXC | NIKL | REXC | NIKL | REXC | |
| 3 months | +0.7% | −21.8% | −1.6 pts | −24.0 pts | +3.1 pts | −19.3 pts |
| 6 months | −1.4% | not published | −19.4 pts | not published | −25.6 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +10.8% | not published | −5.8 pts | not published | −11.0 pts | not published |
| 3 years | −7.1% | not published | −85.5 pts | not published | −105.3 pts | not published |
| Since launch | −12.2% | −22.0% | −115.1 pts | −31.4 pts | −152.3 pts | −35.3 pts |
| NIKL Sprott Nickel Miners ETF Holds 26 stocks in miners and metals, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF Holds 41 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Sprott | Sprott |
| Theme | Miners and metals | Rare earth and critical materials |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 26 | 41 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 74.4% | 75.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.8% | −22.0% (since launch on Apr 15, 2026) |
| vs the S&P 500 | −5.8 pts | −31.4 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −11.0 pts | −35.3 pts |
| Below its high | −30.3% | −31.2% |
| Net assets | $57m | $65m |
NIKL in plain words
By weight, 0% of NIKL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 74% of the fund across 26 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +10.8% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.8 pts. It sits 30.3% below its all-time high of Jan 26, 2026.
REXC in plain words
By weight, 0% of REXC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 75% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Since it launched on Apr 15, 2026 the fund returned −22.0% with distributions reinvested against +9.4% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 31.4 pts. It sits 31.2% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do NIKL and REXC hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, NIKL or REXC?
- NIKL has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and REXC has 0%, so NIKL differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, NIKL or REXC?
- NIKL charges 0.75% a year and REXC charges 0.65%, so REXC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, NIKL against REXC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nikl-vs-rexc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.