Data as of .
FMTL vs NIKL: which is really different?
FMTL and NIKL hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: NIKL scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FMTL and NIKL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FMTL | Only in NIKL |
|---|---|
| BHP Group Limited 8.97% | ANTAM Persero Tbk PT 14.86% |
| Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 8.55% | Nickel Industries Ltd. 11.93% |
| Glencore Plc 7.88% | Merdeka Battery Materials Tbk PT 11.52% |
| Anglo American Plc 6.70% | IGO Ltd. 8.25% |
| Sumitomo Corporation 5.23% | Talon Metals Corp. 6.48% |
| Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. 4.79% | Vale Indonesia Tbk PT 4.75% |
| Cameco Corporation 4.72% | Trimegah Bangun Persada Tbk PT 4.62% |
| Newmont Corporation 4.63% | Sunrise Energy Metals Ltd. 4.24% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMTL | NIKL | FMTL | NIKL | FMTL | NIKL | |
| 3 months | +0.7% | +0.7% | −1.5 pts | −1.6 pts | +3.2 pts | +3.1 pts |
| 6 months | +20.3% | −1.4% | +2.3 pts | −19.4 pts | −3.9 pts | −25.6 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +10.8% | not published | −5.8 pts | not published | −11.0 pts |
| 3 years | not published | −7.1% | not published | −85.5 pts | not published | −105.3 pts |
| Since launch | +50.9% | −12.2% | +37.3 pts | −115.1 pts | +34.7 pts | −152.3 pts |
| FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF Holds 52 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 13% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | NIKL Sprott Nickel Miners ETF Holds 26 stocks in miners and metals, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Sprott |
| Theme | Rare earth and critical materials | Miners and metals |
| In the S&P 500 | 13.2% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.7% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 52 | 26 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 60.6% | 74.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.75% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.65% | 0.75% |
| Total return, 1 year | +50.9% (since launch on Nov 5, 2025) | +10.8% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +37.3 pts | −5.8 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +34.7 pts | −11.0 pts |
| Below its high | −9.5% | −30.3% |
| Net assets | $30m | $57m |
FMTL in plain words
By weight, 13% of FMTL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 52 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Since it launched on Nov 5, 2025 the fund returned +50.9% with distributions reinvested against +13.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 37.2 pts. It sits 9.5% below its all-time high of Aug 25, 2026.
NIKL in plain words
By weight, 0% of NIKL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 74% of the fund across 26 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +10.8% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.8 pts. It sits 30.3% below its all-time high of Jan 26, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do FMTL and NIKL hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, FMTL or NIKL?
- FMTL has 13% of its weight in S&P 500 names and NIKL has 0%, so NIKL differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, FMTL or NIKL?
- FMTL charges 0.65% a year and NIKL charges 0.75%, so FMTL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FMTL against NIKL, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fmtl-vs-nikl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.