Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
REXC vs XME: Holdings Overlap & Returns
REXC and XME hold 7% of their weight in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about REXC and XME
Net assets: $71m on Nov 4, 2026 for Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF, and $3.6bn on Nov 3, 2026 for State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF.
0% of REXC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
22% of XME's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 78% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
Pair scorecard
XME costs 0.30 points a year less; XME is far larger, $3.6bn against $71m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | REXC | XME |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +6.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 46.3%, high on May 6, 2026 | 27.8%, high on Jun 2, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Rare earth and critical materials | Miners and metals |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 8.1 pts | |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.8% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 8.1 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $71m | $3.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 7% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, REXC and XME hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
7% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | REXC | XME | REXC | XME |
| 3 months | −26.7% | −14.4% | not measured | −14.3 pts vs IVV |
| 6 months | −46.3% | −22.7% | not measured | −27.7 pts vs IVV |
| 1 year | – | +6.7% | – | −8.1 pts vs IVV |
| 3 years | – | +89.9% | – | +6.5 pts vs IVV |
| Since launchNot the same days: REXC Apr 2026 · XME Jun 2006 | −39.1% | +174.0% | not measured | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
7% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
REXC
By weight, 0% of REXC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 75% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 15, 2026 the fund returned −39.1% with distributions reinvested. It sits 46.3% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.
XME
By weight, 22% of XME's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 38 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +6.7% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was behind by 8.1 pts. It sits 27.8% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do REXC and XME hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, REXC against XME, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/rexc-vs-xme
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). REXC against XME. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/rexc-vs-xme
[REXC against XME (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/rexc-vs-xme)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.