Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

METL vs REXC: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

METL and REXC hold 5% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about METL and REXC

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $66m for Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF and $71m for Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF.

At a glance
14.2%
METL in the S&P 500
0.0%
REXC in the S&P 500
+6.9%
METL total return, 1 year
−39.1%
REXC total return, since launch, Apr 15, 2026
METL · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 86% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
86% of its weight is outside the S&P 50014% of METL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 86% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.14%86%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 40% of the fund · 45 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in86% of its weight is outside the S&P 50014% of METL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 86% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.14%86%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

14% of METL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 86% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

REXC · 6 months to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of REXC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 75% of the fund · 41 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of REXC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of REXC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

REXC costs 0.34 points a year less; REXC is 1.1 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

METL vs REXC: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureMETLREXC
Return
Total return, 1 year+6.9%not published
Drawdown
Below its all-time high33.0%, high on Jan 28, 202646.3%, high on May 6, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksMiners and metalsRare earth and critical materials
Against the S&P 500, 1 yearbehind by 7.9 pts
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+14.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 7.9 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.99%0.65%
Net assets$66m$71m
Holdings
Holdings in common5%

Method

What they share

5%

By the books each fund has filed, METL and REXC hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

5% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first METL REXC
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. 2.95% 21.26%
MP Materials Corp. 1.65% 18.95%
Lindian Resources Ltd. 0.40% 2.97%
USA Rare Earth Inc. 0.35% 4.34%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in METL
Nucor Corp. 5.14%
Major Drilling Group International Inc. 4.50%
Steel Dynamics Inc. 4.29%
Reliance Inc. 4.17%
Hudbay Minerals Inc. 4.01%
NexGen Energy Ltd. 3.75%
Endeavour Silver Corp. 3.74%
Cameco Corp. 3.37%
Only in REXC
Iluka Resources Ltd. 5.57%
Neo Performance Materials Inc. 5.36%
Sunrise Energy Metals Ltd. 4.57%
Critical Metals Corp. 4.27%
Arafura Rare Earths Ltd. 3.96%
Meteoric Resources Ltd. 3.29%
NioCorp Developments Ltd. 3.18%
REalloys Inc. 3.05%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: METL vs REXC: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowMETLREXCMETLREXC
3 months−16.2%−26.7%−16.1 pts vs VOOnot measured
6 months−26.0%−46.3%−31.0 pts vs VOOnot measured
1 year+6.9%–−7.9 pts vs VOO–
Since launchNot the same days: METL Sep 2025 · REXC Apr 2026+12.3%−39.1%−6.9 pts vs VOOnot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF · Holds 45 stocks in miners and metals, 14% of its weight in S&P 500 companies REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF · Holds 41 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Sprott Sprott
Theme Miners and metals Rare earth and critical materials
In the S&P 500 14.2% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.7% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 45 41
Top ten, share of the fund 39.6% 74.8%
Expense ratio 0.99% 0.65%
Fee for the differing part 0.99% 0.65%
Total return, 1 year +6.9% −39.1% (since launch, Apr 15, 2026)
vs its benchmark −7.9 pts vs VOO not measured
Below its high −33.0% −46.3%
Net assets $66m $71m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

5% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
METL

By weight, 14% of METL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +6.9% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Total Return Index, so a holder was behind by 7.9 pts. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

REXC

By weight, 0% of REXC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 75% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 15, 2026 the fund returned −39.1% with distributions reinvested. It sits 46.3% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do METL and REXC hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, METL or REXC?
METL has 14% of its weight in S&P 500 names and REXC has 0%, so REXC differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, METL or REXC?
METL charges 0.99% a year and REXC charges 0.65%, so REXC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, METL against REXC, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/metl-vs-rexc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.