Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

SETM vs SILJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SETM returned +3.9% to SILJ's +19.6%; 18% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SETM and SILJ

Net assets: $421m on Nov 4, 2026 for Sprott Critical Materials ETF, and $2.9bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF.

At a glance
9.1%
SETM in the S&P 500
0.0%
SILJ in the S&P 500
+3.9%
SETM total return, 1 year
+19.6%
SILJ total return, 1 year
SETM · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 91% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
91% of its weight is outside the S&P 5009% of SETM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.9%91%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 40% of the fund · 156 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in91% of its weight is outside the S&P 5009% of SETM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.9%91%9% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

9% of SETM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

SILJ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of SILJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 60% of the fund · 66 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of SILJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of SILJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

SETM costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.7 points; SILJ is 7.1 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

SETM vs SILJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureSETMSILJ
Return
Total return, 1 year+3.9%+19.6%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high37.4%, high on Jan 28, 202639.4%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksRare earth and critical materialsSilver miners
Against the S&P 500, 1 yearbehind by 10.9 pts
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+14.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 10.9 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.65%0.69%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$410m$2.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common18%

Method

Risk and return

Feb 10, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026 · 194 weekly returns
SETM SILJ
Return
Total return edge SILJ +34.3% +140.5%
Annualized edge SILJ +8.2% +26.5%
Price return edge SILJ +26.5% +119.6%
Risk
Volatility edge SETM 36.2% 47.4%
Max drawdown edge SETM −39.0% −44.2%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SILJ 0.27 0.63
Sortino edge SILJ 0.39 1.01
Calmar edge SILJ 0.21 0.60
Reading

From Feb 2023 to Oct 2026, SILJ returned more: +140.5% to +34.3%. SETM swung less: 36.2% to 47.4%. SETM fell less at its worst: −39.0% to −44.2%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: SETM vs SILJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureSETMSILJEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+34.3%+140.5%SILJPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+8.2%+26.5%SILJTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+26.5%+119.6%SILJPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility36.2%47.4%SETMSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation25.6%29.9%SETMLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−39.0%−44.2%SETMDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.270.63SILJReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.391.01SILJReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.210.60SILJAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 194 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

18%

By the books each fund has filed, SETM and SILJ hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

18% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first SETM SILJ
Hecla Mining Co. 3.42% 10.28%
First Majestic Silver Corp. 3.33% 9.95%
Aya Gold & Silver Inc. 2.79% 4.32%
Cia de Minas Buenaventura SAA 2.78% 3.31%
Silvercorp Metals Inc. 0.97% 2.70%
Endeavour Silver Corp. 0.95% 3.54%
KGHM Polska Miedz SA 1.41% 0.88%
Americas Gold & Silver Corp. 0.51% 1.41%
AbraSilver Resource Corp. 0.47% 1.10%
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. 0.46% 1.11%
GoGold Resources Inc. 0.42% 0.57%
Vizsla Silver Corp. 0.41% 1.89%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in SETM
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 5.47%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. 4.87%
Cameco Corp. 4.81%
NAC Kazatomprom JSC 4.15%
Teck Resources Ltd. 3.95%
Albemarle Corp. 3.61%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA 3.40%
PLS Group Ltd. 3.12%
Only in SILJ
COEUR MINING INC. 9.50%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 6.31%
Boliden AB 4.68%
SSR Mining Inc 4.61%
OR Royalties Inc 3.14%
Hycroft Mining Holding Corp 3.05%
Pan American Silver Corp 3.02%
Seabridge Gold Inc 2.96%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: SETM vs SILJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowSETMSILJSETMSILJ
3 months−21.2%−12.0%−21.1 pts vs VOOnot measured
6 months−35.3%−21.4%−40.3 pts vs VOOnot measured
1 year+3.9%+19.6%−10.9 pts vs VOOnot measured
3 years+57.7%+205.4%−25.6 pts vs VOOnot measured
Since launchNot the same days: SETM Feb 2023 · SILJ Nov 2012+29.5%+42.1%−64.0 pts vs VOOnot measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF · Holds 156 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF · Holds 66 stocks in silver miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Rare earth and critical materials Silver miners
In the S&P 500 9.1% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.8% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 156 66
Top ten, share of the fund 40.1% 59.6%
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.69%
Fee for the differing part 0.65% 0.69%
Total return, 1 year +3.9% +19.6%
vs its benchmark −10.9 pts vs VOO not measured
Below its high −37.4% −39.4%
Net assets, SETM as of Nov 4, 2026 and SILJ as of Nov 3, 2026 $421m $2.9bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

18% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

SILJ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
SETM

By weight, 9% of SETM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 156 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.9% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Total Return Index, so a holder was behind by 10.9 pts. It sits 37.4% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

SILJ

By weight, 0% of SILJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 66 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 39.4% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do SETM and SILJ hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 18% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, SETM or SILJ?
SETM has 9% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SILJ has 0%, so SILJ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, SETM or SILJ?
SETM charges 0.65% a year and SILJ charges 0.69%, so SETM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SETM against SILJ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/setm-vs-silj

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.