Do REXC and SLVP hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, REXC or SLVP?

REXC has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SLVP has 5%, so REXC differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, REXC or SLVP?

REXC charges 0.65% a year and SLVP charges 0.39%, so SLVP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

REXC vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

REXC and SLVP hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about REXC and SLVP

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $71m for Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF and $799m for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF.

REXC on its own →SLVP on its own →

At a glance

0.0%

REXC in the S&P 500

5.3%

SLVP in the S&P 500

−39.1%

REXC total return, since launch, Apr 15, 2026

+31.0%

SLVP total return, 1 year

REXC · 6 months to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of REXC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

SLVP · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 95% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

5% of SLVP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

SLVP costs 0.26 points a year less; SLVP is 11.3 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

REXC vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	REXC	SLVP
Return
Measure	REXC	SLVP
Total return, 1 year	not published	+31.0%
Drawdown
Measure	REXC	SLVP
Below its all-time high	46.3%, high on May 6, 2026	33.0%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	REXC	SLVP
What it tracks	Rare earth and critical materials	Silver miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year		+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 year		ahead by 16.0 pts
Cost and size
Measure	REXC	SLVP
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.39%
Net assets	$71m	$799m
Holdings
Measure	REXC	SLVP
Holdings in common	0%

Method

Risk and return

Apr 24, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026 · 27 weekly returns

REXC SLVP

Return

Total return edge SLVP −38.0% −22.8%

Price return edge SLVP −38.0% −23.1%

Risk

Max drawdown edge SLVP −45.6% −29.1%

Reading

From Apr 2026 to Oct 2026, SLVP returned more: −22.8% to −38.0%. SLVP fell less at its worst: −29.1% to −45.6%.

Full scorecard

3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: REXC vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	REXC	SLVP	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	−38.0%	−22.8%	SLVP	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Price return	−38.0%	−23.1%	SLVP	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Max drawdown	−45.6%	−29.1%	SLVP	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 27 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, REXC and SLVP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first REXC SLVP

Only in one fund ↓

Only in REXC

Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. 21.26%

MP Materials Corp. 18.95%

Iluka Resources Ltd. 5.57%

Neo Performance Materials Inc. 5.36%

Sunrise Energy Metals Ltd. 4.57%

USA Rare Earth Inc. 4.34%

Critical Metals Corp. 4.27%

Arafura Rare Earths Ltd. 3.96%

Only in SLVP

HECLA MINING 13.56%

INDUST PENOLES 11.08%

FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER 10.21%

FRESNILLO PLC 8.30%

NEWMONT 5.32%

AYA GOLD & SILVER INC 5.25%

AGNICO EAGLE MINES 4.99%

DISCOVERY MINING LTD 4.85%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: REXC vs SLVP: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	REXC	SLVP	REXC	SLVP
3 months	−26.7%	−6.8%	not measured	−5.5 pts vs ACWI
6 months	−46.3%	−14.7%	not measured	−17.3 pts vs ACWI
1 year	–	+31.0%	–	+16.0 pts vs ACWI
3 years	–	+257.6%	–	+180.0 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: REXC Apr 2026 · SLVP Feb 2012	−39.1%	+53.4%	not measured	−314.3 pts vs ACWI

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF · Holds 41 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF · Holds 37 stocks in silver miners, 5% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Sprott iShares

Theme Rare earth and critical materials Silver miners

In the S&P 500 0.0% 5.3%

Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 99.8%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%

Holdings 41 37

Top ten, share of the fund 74.8% 72.1%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.39%

Fee for the differing part 0.65% 0.39%

Total return, 1 year −39.1% (since launch, Apr 15, 2026) +31.0%

vs its benchmark not measured +16.0 pts vs ACWI

Below its high −46.3% −33.0%

Net assets $71m $799m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for REXC.

Alert

About each fund

REXC

By weight, 0% of REXC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 75% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 15, 2026 the fund returned −39.1% with distributions reinvested. It sits 46.3% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

SLVP

By weight, 5% of SLVP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 72% of the fund across 37 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 16.0 pts. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do REXC and SLVP hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, REXC or SLVP?: REXC has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SLVP has 5%, so REXC differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, REXC or SLVP?: REXC charges 0.65% a year and SLVP charges 0.39%, so SLVP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

REXC vs SILJ REXC vs SIL REXC vs AGMI REXC vs GOAU SLVP vs WDIG SLVP vs EART SLVP vs FMTL SLVP vs SETM

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →REXC on its own →SLVP on its own →REXC holdings →SLVP dividend history →SLVP holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

REXC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

REXC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Sprott page for REXC ↗

SLVP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SLVP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for SLVP ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, REXC against SLVP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/rexc-vs-slvp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.