Which is more different from the S&P 500, NRES or TURF?

NRES has 33% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TURF has 30%, so NRES differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, NRES or TURF?

NRES charges 0.45% a year and TURF charges 0.44%, so TURF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

NRES vs TURF: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

NRES holds 33.4% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and TURF 30.2%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about NRES and TURF

Net assets: $35m on Nov 2, 2026 for Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF, and $335m on Nov 3, 2026 for T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF.

NRES on its own →TURF on its own →

At a glance

33.4%

NRES in the S&P 500

30.2%

TURF in the S&P 500

+27.4%

NRES total return, 1 year

+25.6%

TURF total return, 1 year

NRES · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 67% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

33% of NRES's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 67% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.

TURF · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 70% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

30% of TURF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 70% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

Pair scorecard

TURF costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.8 points; TURF is 9.6 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

NRES vs TURF: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	NRES	TURF
Return
Measure	NRES	TURF
Total return, 1 year	+27.4%	+25.6%
Drawdown
Measure	NRES	TURF
Below its all-time high	8.2%, high on Aug 21, 2026	9.3%, high on Sep 9, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	NRES	TURF
What it tracks	Natural resources	Natural resources
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+32.9%	+26.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	behind by 5.5 pts	behind by 1.2 pts
Cost and size
Measure	NRES	TURF
Expense ratio	0.45%	0.44%
Net assets, as of Nov 2, 2026	$35m	$335m
Holdings
Measure	NRES	TURF
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Window by window

Window by window: NRES vs TURF: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	NRES	TURF	NRES	TURF
3 months	+0.7%	+0.3%	−0.7 pts vs GNR	−1.0 pts vs GUNR
6 months	−3.0%	−5.5%	−3.4 pts vs GNR	−3.0 pts vs GUNR
1 year	+27.4%	+25.6%	−5.5 pts vs GNR	−1.2 pts vs GUNR
Since launchNot the same days: NRES Feb 2024 · TURF Jun 2025	+42.8%	+33.5%	−8.9 pts vs GNR	−2.5 pts vs GUNR

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

NRES Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF · Holds 58 stocks in natural resources, 33% of its weight in S&P 500 companies TURF T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF · Holds 84 stocks in natural resources, 30% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Xtrackers T. Rowe Price

Theme Natural resources Natural resources

In the S&P 500 33.4% 30.2%

Active share vs the S&P 500 98.2% 97.9%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.7% 0.7%

Holdings 58 84

Top ten, share of the fund 37.2% 36.7%

Expense ratio 0.45% 0.44%

Fee for the differing part 0.46% 0.45%

Total return, 1 year +27.4% +25.6%

vs its benchmark −5.5 pts vs GNR −1.2 pts vs GUNR

Below its high −8.2% −9.3%

Net assets, NRES as of Nov 2, 2026 and TURF as of Nov 3, 2026 $35m $335m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

NRES

By weight, 33% of NRES's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 37% of the fund across 58 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested against +32.9% for its benchmark, the S&P Global Natural Resources Net TR index, so a holder was behind by 5.5 pts. It sits 8.2% below its all-time high of Aug 21, 2026.

TURF

By weight, 30% of TURF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 37% of the fund across 84 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested against +26.8% for its benchmark, the Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Net, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. It sits 9.3% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is more different from the S&P 500, NRES or TURF?: NRES has 33% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TURF has 30%, so NRES differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, NRES or TURF?: NRES charges 0.45% a year and TURF charges 0.44%, so TURF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

NRES vs FTRI NRES vs CSNR NRES vs FTWO NRES vs GUNR TURF vs FTWO TURF vs CSNR TURF vs FTRI TURF vs HAP

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →NRES on its own →TURF on its own →NRES dividend history →TURF dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

NRES filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

NRES prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Xtrackers website ↗

TURF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

TURF prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

T. Rowe Price website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, NRES against TURF, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nres-vs-turf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.