Data as of .
LFSC vs THMZ: which is really different?
LFSC and THMZ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and LFSC returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: LFSC scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, LFSC and THMZ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in LFSC | Only in THMZ |
|---|---|
| Travere Therapeutics Inc 7.66% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 6.22% |
| Cogent Biosciences Inc 7.52% | Applied Materials Inc 5.68% |
| LivaNova PLC 7.11% | Alphabet Inc 3.63% |
| Spyre Therapeutics Inc 6.41% | Amazon.com Inc 3.58% |
| Guardant Health Inc 5.51% | Microsoft Corp 2.84% |
| Mirum Pharmaceuticals Inc 4.92% | NVIDIA Corp 2.83% |
| Corcept Therapeutics Inc 4.79% | Mitsubishi Electric Corp 2.79% |
| United Therapeutics Corp 4.15% | Keysight Technologies Inc 2.66% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFSC | THMZ | LFSC | THMZ | LFSC | THMZ | |
| 3 months | +8.7% | +0.3% | +6.5 pts | −1.9 pts | +11.2 pts | +2.8 pts |
| 6 months | +36.0% | +17.1% | +17.9 pts | −1.0 pts | +11.7 pts | −7.2 pts |
| 1 year | +53.0% | +7.2% | +36.5 pts | −9.4 pts | +31.3 pts | −14.6 pts |
| Since launch | +81.3% | +37.0% | +44.3 pts | −16.5 pts | +30.9 pts | −34.3 pts |
| LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF Holds 39 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | THMZ Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF Holds 59 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 55% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | F/m | Lazard |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 55.2% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 73.1% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.6% | 30.2% |
| Holdings | 39 | 59 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 54.7% | 35.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.54% | 0.50% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.54% | 0.68% |
| Total return, 1 year | +53.0% | +7.2% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +36.5 pts | −9.4 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +31.3 pts | −14.6 pts |
| Below its high | −6.8% | −3.5% |
| Net assets | $105m | $54m |
LFSC in plain words
By weight, 0% of LFSC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +53.0% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 36.5 pts. It sits 6.8% below its all-time high of Aug 19, 2026.
THMZ in plain words
By weight, 55% of THMZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 73%. The top ten holdings are 35% of the fund across 59 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do LFSC and THMZ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, LFSC or THMZ?
- LFSC has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and THMZ has 55%, so LFSC differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, LFSC or THMZ?
- LFSC charges 0.54% a year and THMZ charges 0.50%, so THMZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, LFSC against THMZ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/lfsc-vs-thmz Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.