IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

LFSC vs THMZ: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LFSC returned +43.6% to THMZ's +6.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about LFSC and THMZ

Net assets: $126m on Aug 31, 2026 for F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF, and $54m on Jun 30, 2026 for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF.

LFSC on its own →THMZ on its own →
At a glance
0.0%
LFSC in the S&P 500
53.9%
THMZ in the S&P 500
+43.6%
LFSC total return, 1 year
+6.1%
THMZ total return, 1 year
LFSC · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of LFSC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 54% of the fund · 38 holdings as filed for Aug 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of LFSC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of LFSC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.

THMZ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 46% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
46% of its weight is outside the S&P 50054% of THMZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 46% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.54%46%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 74% · top ten 34% of the fund · 59 holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 30% in46% of its weight is outside the S&P 50054% of THMZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 46% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.54%46%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 74% · Nasdaq-100: 30% in

54% of THMZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 46% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

Pair scorecard

THMZ costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 37.5 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

LFSC vs THMZ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureLFSCTHMZ
Return
Total return, 1 year+43.6%+6.1%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high5.7%, high on Aug 19, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBroad innovation and megatrendsBroad innovation and megatrends
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+14.8%+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 28.8 ptsbehind by 8.9 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.50%
Net assets, LFSC as of Aug 31, 2026 and THMZ as of Jun 30, 2026$126m$54m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, LFSC and THMZ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first LFSC THMZ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in LFSC
Travere Therapeutics Inc 8.71%
Corcept Therapeutics Inc 6.72%
Spyre Therapeutics Inc 6.70%
LivaNova PLC 6.61%
Cogent Biosciences Inc 6.48%
Mirum Pharmaceuticals Inc 4.32%
Billiontoone Inc 3.86%
Guardant Health Inc 3.81%
Only in THMZ
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 6.07%
Applied Materials Inc 5.54%
Alphabet Inc 3.54%
Amazon.com Inc 3.50%
Microsoft Corp 2.77%
NVIDIA Corp 2.76%
Mitsubishi Electric Corp 2.72%
Keysight Technologies Inc 2.59%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: LFSC vs THMZ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowLFSCTHMZLFSCTHMZ
3 months−3.8%−2.0%−3.5 pts vs IWV−0.7 pts vs ACWI
6 months+16.9%+2.8%+12.0 pts vs IWV+0.2 pts vs ACWI
1 year+43.6%+6.1%+28.8 pts vs IWV−8.9 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: LFSC Oct 2024 · THMZ Apr 2025+83.4%+38.4%+46.4 pts vs IWV−16.1 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF · Holds 38 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies THMZ Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF · Holds 59 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 54% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer F/m Lazard
Theme Broad innovation and megatrends Broad innovation and megatrends
In the S&P 500 0.0% 53.9%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 73.5%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 29.5%
Holdings 38 59
Top ten, share of the fund 54.0% 34.3%
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.50%
Fee for the differing part 0.54% 0.68%
Total return, 1 year +43.6% +6.1%
vs its benchmark +28.8 pts vs IWV −8.9 pts vs ACWI
Below its high −5.7% −2.6%
Net assets, LFSC as of Aug 31, 2026 and THMZ as of Jun 30, 2026 $126m $54m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
LFSC

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +43.6% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Total Return, so a holder was ahead by 28.8 pts.

By weight, 0% of LFSC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 54% of the fund across 38 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. It sits 5.7% below its all-time high of Aug 19, 2026.

THMZ

By weight, 54% of THMZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 74%. The top ten holdings are 34% of the fund across 59 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +6.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 8.9 pts.

Questions people ask

Do LFSC and THMZ hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, LFSC or THMZ?
LFSC has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and THMZ has 54%, so LFSC differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, LFSC or THMZ?
LFSC charges 0.54% a year and THMZ charges 0.50%, so THMZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
LFSC vs TEKYLFSC vs GDOCLFSC vs TNXTLFSC vs DTRETHMZ vs FDTXTHMZ vs ABOTTHMZ vs ARKKTHMZ vs AOTG
Where to next
All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →LFSC on its own →THMZ on its own →LFSC holdings →THMZ dividend history →THMZ holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
LFSC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
LFSC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
F/m website ↗
THMZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
THMZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Lazard website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, LFSC against THMZ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/lfsc-vs-thmz

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.