Data as of .
ABOT vs THMZ: which is really different?
ABOT and THMZ hold 9% of their weight in the same names.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: ABOT scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
9% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ABOT and THMZ hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ABOT | THMZ |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 6.32% | 2.83% |
| Broadcom Inc | 4.61% | 2.28% |
| Apple Inc | 5.46% | 1.95% |
| QUALCOMM Inc | 3.18% | 1.53% |
| Only in ABOT | Only in THMZ |
|---|---|
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 3.21% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 6.22% |
| Airbnb Inc 3.06% | Applied Materials Inc 5.68% |
| VeriSign Inc 2.88% | Alphabet Inc 3.63% |
| AbbVie Inc 2.85% | Amazon.com Inc 3.58% |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.49% | Microsoft Corp 2.84% |
| NetApp Inc 2.44% | Mitsubishi Electric Corp 2.79% |
| Adobe Inc 2.29% | Keysight Technologies Inc 2.66% |
| Autodesk Inc 2.28% | FANUC Corp 2.54% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABOT | THMZ | ABOT | THMZ | ABOT | THMZ | |
| 3 months | +15.7% | +0.3% | +13.4 pts | −1.9 pts | +18.2 pts | +2.8 pts |
| 6 months | +30.5% | +17.1% | +12.4 pts | −1.0 pts | +6.2 pts | −7.2 pts |
| 1 year | +7.7% | +7.2% | −8.9 pts | −9.4 pts | −14.1 pts | −14.6 pts |
| 3 years | +76.5% | not published | −1.9 pts | not published | −21.6 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +88.3% | +37.0% | −34.9 pts | −16.5 pts | −53.9 pts | −34.3 pts |
| ABOT Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF Holds 54 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 70% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | THMZ Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF Holds 59 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 55% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Abacus FCF | Lazard |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 70.2% | 55.2% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 80.9% | 73.1% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 46.5% | 30.2% |
| Holdings | 54 | 59 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 36.5% | 35.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.50% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.48% | 0.68% |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.7% | +7.2% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −8.9 pts | −9.4 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −14.1 pts | −14.6 pts |
| Below its high | −2.4% | −3.5% |
| Net assets | $4m | $54m |
ABOT in plain words
By weight, 70% of ABOT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 54 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +7.7% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 8.9 pts.
THMZ in plain words
By weight, 55% of THMZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 73%. The top ten holdings are 35% of the fund across 59 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do ABOT and THMZ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, ABOT or THMZ?
- ABOT has 70% of its weight in S&P 500 names and THMZ has 55%, so ABOT differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, ABOT or THMZ?
- ABOT charges 0.39% a year and THMZ charges 0.50%, so ABOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ABOT against THMZ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/abot-vs-thmz Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.