Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
ABOT vs THMZ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ABOT returned +13.5% to THMZ's +6.1%; 8% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ABOT and THMZ
Net assets: $4.0m on Jul 31, 2026 for Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF, and $54m on Jun 30, 2026 for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF.
64% of ABOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 36% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
54% of THMZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 46% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.
Pair scorecard
ABOT costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.4 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ABOT | THMZ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.5% | +6.1% |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.0% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 8.9 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, ABOT as of Jul 31, 2026 and THMZ as of Jun 30, 2026 | $4.0m | $54m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 8% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 32% | 34% |
How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 114 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed
Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ABOT and THMZ hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
8% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ABOT | THMZ | ABOT | THMZ |
| 3 months | +7.7% | −2.0% | not measured | −0.7 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | +24.2% | +2.8% | not measured | +0.2 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | +13.5% | +6.1% | not measured | −8.9 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | +86.1% | – | not measured | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: ABOT Dec 2020 · THMZ Apr 2025 | +94.5% | +38.4% | not measured | −16.1 pts vs ACWI |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
8% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
ABOT
By weight, 64% of ABOT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 84%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 50 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested.
THMZ
By weight, 54% of THMZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 74%. The top ten holdings are 34% of the fund across 59 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +6.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 8.9 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do ABOT and THMZ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ABOT against THMZ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/abot-vs-thmz
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). ABOT against THMZ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/abot-vs-thmz
[ABOT against THMZ (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/abot-vs-thmz)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.