Data as of .
GDMN vs REXC: which is really different?
GDMN and REXC hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: REXC scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GDMN and REXC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in GDMN | Only in REXC |
|---|---|
| NEWMONT CORP 12.40% | Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. 19.82% |
| BARRICK MINING CORP 8.21% | MP Materials Corp. 19.11% |
| AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD 7.93% | USA Rare Earth Inc. 6.23% |
| ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC 6.25% | Sunrise Energy Metals Ltd. 6.05% |
| KINROSS GOLD CORP 5.78% | Neo Performance Materials Inc. 5.00% |
| GOLD FIELDS LTD 4.79% | Iluka Resources Ltd. 4.62% |
| WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP 4.31% | Arafura Rare Earths Ltd. 4.04% |
| FRANCO-NEVADA CORP 3.93% | Lindian Resources Ltd. 3.85% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDMN | REXC | GDMN | REXC | GDMN | REXC | |
| 3 months | +13.8% | −21.8% | +11.5 pts | −24.0 pts | +16.3 pts | −19.3 pts |
| 6 months | +8.7% | not published | −9.4 pts | not published | −15.6 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +40.2% | not published | +23.7 pts | not published | +18.5 pts | not published |
| 3 years | +381.8% | not published | +303.4 pts | not published | +283.6 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +342.7% | −22.0% | +268.0 pts | −31.4 pts | +250.7 pts | −35.3 pts |
| GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund Holds 54 stocks in gold miners, 12% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF Holds 41 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | WisdomTree | Sprott |
| Theme | Gold miners | Rare earth and critical materials |
| In the S&P 500 | 12.4% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.8% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 54 | 41 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 60.6% | 75.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | 0.65% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.45% | 0.65% |
| Total return, 1 year | +40.2% | −22.0% (since launch on Apr 15, 2026) |
| vs the S&P 500 | +23.7 pts | −31.4 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +18.5 pts | −35.3 pts |
| Below its high | −33.8% | −31.2% |
| Net assets | $223m | $65m |
GDMN in plain words
By weight, 12% of GDMN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 54 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +40.2% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 23.7 pts. It sits 33.8% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.
REXC in plain words
By weight, 0% of REXC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 75% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Since it launched on Apr 15, 2026 the fund returned −22.0% with distributions reinvested against +9.4% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 31.4 pts. It sits 31.2% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do GDMN and REXC hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, GDMN or REXC?
- GDMN has 12% of its weight in S&P 500 names and REXC has 0%, so REXC differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, GDMN or REXC?
- GDMN charges 0.45% a year and REXC charges 0.65%, so GDMN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GDMN against REXC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdmn-vs-rexc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.