Do REXC and SGDM hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, REXC or SGDM?

REXC has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SGDM has 8%, so REXC differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, REXC or SGDM?

REXC charges 0.65% a year and SGDM charges 0.46%, so SGDM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

REXC vs SGDM: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

REXC and SGDM hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about REXC and SGDM

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $71m for Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF and $617m for Sprott Gold Miners ETF.

REXC on its own →SGDM on its own →

At a glance

0.0%

REXC in the S&P 500

8.0%

SGDM in the S&P 500

−39.1%

REXC total return, since launch, Apr 15, 2026

+27.9%

SGDM total return, 1 year

REXC · 6 months to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of REXC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

SGDM · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 92% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

8% of SGDM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

SGDM costs 0.19 points a year less; SGDM is 8.7 times larger.

REXC vs SGDM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	REXC	SGDM
Return
Measure	REXC	SGDM
Total return, 1 year	not published	+27.9%
Drawdown
Measure	REXC	SGDM
Below its all-time high	46.3%, high on May 6, 2026	25.6%, high on Mar 2, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	REXC	SGDM
What it tracks	Rare earth and critical materials	Gold miners
Cost and size
Measure	REXC	SGDM
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.46%
Net assets	$71m	$617m
Holdings
Measure	REXC	SGDM
Holdings in common	0%

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, REXC and SGDM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first REXC SGDM

Only in one fund ↓

Only in REXC

Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. 21.26%

MP Materials Corp. 18.95%

Iluka Resources Ltd. 5.57%

Neo Performance Materials Inc. 5.36%

Sunrise Energy Metals Ltd. 4.57%

USA Rare Earth Inc. 4.34%

Critical Metals Corp. 4.27%

Arafura Rare Earths Ltd. 3.96%

Only in SGDM

Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. 10.02%

Newmont Corp. 8.00%

Barrick Mining Corp. 7.73%

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. 7.10%

Franco-Nevada Corp. 6.17%

Kinross Gold Corp. 3.85%

Lundin Gold Inc. 3.58%

Pan American Silver Corp. 3.45%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: REXC vs SGDM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return
Window	REXC	SGDM
3 months	−26.7%	+2.7%
6 months	−46.3%	−5.9%
1 year	–	+27.9%
3 years	–	+198.6%
Since launchNot the same days: REXC Apr 2026 · SGDM Jul 2014	−39.1%	+219.4%

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF · Holds 41 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF · Holds 48 stocks in gold miners, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Sprott Sprott

Theme Rare earth and critical materials Gold miners

In the S&P 500 0.0% 8.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 99.8%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%

Holdings 41 48

Top ten, share of the fund 74.8% 56.0%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.46%

Fee for the differing part 0.65% 0.46%

Total return, 1 year −39.1% (since launch, Apr 15, 2026) +27.9%

vs its benchmark not measured not measured

Below its high −46.3% −25.6%

Net assets $71m $617m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

REXC

By weight, 0% of REXC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 75% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 15, 2026 the fund returned −39.1% with distributions reinvested. It sits 46.3% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

SGDM

By weight, 8% of SGDM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 48 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +27.9% with distributions reinvested. It sits 25.6% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do REXC and SGDM hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, REXC or SGDM?: REXC has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SGDM has 8%, so REXC differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, REXC or SGDM?: REXC charges 0.65% a year and SGDM charges 0.46%, so SGDM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

REXC vs SGDJ REXC vs GDXJ REXC vs GDX REXC vs AUAU SGDM vs EART SGDM vs FMTL SGDM vs WDIG SGDM vs ISTM

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →REXC on its own →SGDM on its own →REXC holdings →SGDM dividend history →SGDM holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

REXC and SGDM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

REXC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Sprott page for REXC ↗

SGDM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Sprott page for SGDM ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, REXC against SGDM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/rexc-vs-sgdm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.