Data as of .
REXC vs SGDM: which is really different?
REXC and SGDM hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: REXC scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, REXC and SGDM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in REXC | Only in SGDM |
|---|---|
| Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. 19.82% | Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. 9.67% |
| MP Materials Corp. 19.11% | Newmont Corp. 7.42% |
| USA Rare Earth Inc. 6.23% | Barrick Mining Corp. 7.36% |
| Sunrise Energy Metals Ltd. 6.05% | Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. 7.22% |
| Neo Performance Materials Inc. 5.00% | Franco-Nevada Corp. 6.04% |
| Iluka Resources Ltd. 4.62% | Kinross Gold Corp. 4.47% |
| Arafura Rare Earths Ltd. 4.04% | Pan American Silver Corp. 3.69% |
| Lindian Resources Ltd. 3.85% | Coeur Mining Inc. 3.57% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REXC | SGDM | REXC | SGDM | REXC | SGDM | |
| 3 months | −21.8% | +17.8% | −24.0 pts | +15.5 pts | −19.3 pts | +20.3 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +20.2% | not published | +2.2 pts | not published | −4.0 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +43.7% | not published | +27.1 pts | not published | +21.9 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +234.7% | not published | +156.3 pts | not published | +136.6 pts |
| Since launch | −22.0% | +261.2% | −31.4 pts | −112.7 pts | −35.3 pts | −467.4 pts |
| REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF Holds 41 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF Holds 48 stocks in gold miners, 7% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Sprott | Sprott |
| Theme | Rare earth and critical materials | Gold miners |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 7.4% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 99.8% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 41 | 48 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 75.3% | 55.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.46% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.65% | 0.46% |
| Total return, 1 year | −22.0% (since launch on Apr 15, 2026) | +43.7% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −31.4 pts | +27.1 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −35.3 pts | +21.9 pts |
| Below its high | −31.2% | −15.9% |
| Net assets | $65m | $713m |
REXC in plain words
By weight, 0% of REXC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 75% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Since it launched on Apr 15, 2026 the fund returned −22.0% with distributions reinvested against +9.4% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 31.4 pts. It sits 31.2% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.
SGDM in plain words
By weight, 7% of SGDM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 48 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +43.7% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 27.1 pts. It sits 15.9% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do REXC and SGDM hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, REXC or SGDM?
- REXC has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SGDM has 7%, so REXC differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, REXC or SGDM?
- REXC charges 0.65% a year and SGDM charges 0.46%, so SGDM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, REXC against SGDM, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/rexc-vs-sgdm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.