Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
GDXJ vs REXC: Holdings Overlap & Returns
GDXJ and REXC hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GDXJ and REXC
Net assets: $7.0bn on Nov 3, 2026 for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF, and $71m on Nov 4, 2026 for Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF.
0% of GDXJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.
0% of REXC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
Pair scorecard
GDXJ costs 0.13 points a year less; GDXJ is far larger, $7.0bn against $71m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | GDXJ | REXC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +21.7% | not published |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 33.3%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 46.3%, high on May 6, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Gold miners | Rare earth and critical materials |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.0% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 6.7 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.52% | 0.65% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $7.0bn | $71m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, GDXJ and REXC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | GDXJ | REXC | GDXJ | REXC |
| 3 months | −4.8% | −26.7% | −3.5 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| 6 months | −15.1% | −46.3% | −17.7 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| 1 year | +21.7% | – | +6.7 pts vs ACWI | – |
| 3 years | +210.2% | – | +132.6 pts vs ACWI | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: GDXJ Nov 2009 · REXC Apr 2026 | +44.7% | −39.1% | not measured | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
GDXJ
By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 155 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 6.7 pts. It sits 33.3% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
REXC
By weight, 0% of REXC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 75% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 15, 2026 the fund returned −39.1% with distributions reinvested. It sits 46.3% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do GDXJ and REXC hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GDXJ against REXC, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdxj-vs-rexc
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). GDXJ against REXC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdxj-vs-rexc
[GDXJ against REXC (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdxj-vs-rexc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.