Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
GDXJ vs ISTM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GDXJ returned +21.7% to ISTM's +18.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GDXJ and ISTM
Net assets: $7.0bn on Nov 3, 2026 for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF, and $28m on Nov 4, 2026 for iShares Strategic Metals ETF.
0% of GDXJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.
1% of ISTM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 99% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
Pair scorecard
ISTM costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points; GDXJ is far larger, $7.0bn against $27m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | GDXJ | ISTM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +21.7% | +18.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 33.3%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 22.6%, high on Jan 29, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Gold miners | Rare earth and critical materials |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.0% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 6.7 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.52% | 0.47% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $7.0bn | $27m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, GDXJ and ISTM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | GDXJ | ISTM | GDXJ | ISTM |
| 3 months | −4.8% | −8.4% | −3.5 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| 6 months | −15.1% | −12.6% | −17.7 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| 1 year | +21.7% | +18.3% | +6.7 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| 3 years | +210.2% | +68.3% | +132.6 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| Since launchNot the same days: GDXJ Nov 2009 · ISTM Sep 2023 | +44.7% | +66.9% | not measured | not measured |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
GDXJ
By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 155 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 6.7 pts. It sits 33.3% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
ISTM
By weight, 1% of ISTM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 11% of the fund across 86 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +18.3% with distributions reinvested. It sits 22.6% below its all-time high of Jan 29, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do GDXJ and ISTM hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GDXJ against ISTM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdxj-vs-istm
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). GDXJ against ISTM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdxj-vs-istm
[GDXJ against ISTM (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdxj-vs-istm)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.