Data as of .
REXC vs RING: which is really different?
REXC and RING hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: REXC scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, REXC and RING hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | REXC | RING |
|---|---|---|
| Idaho Strategic Resources Inc. | 0.35% | 0.00% |
| Only in REXC | Only in RING |
|---|---|
| Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. 19.82% | NEWMONT 16.36% |
| MP Materials Corp. 19.11% | AGNICO EAGLE MINES 12.29% |
| USA Rare Earth Inc. 6.23% | BARRICK MINING 8.16% |
| Sunrise Energy Metals Ltd. 6.05% | WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS 7.58% |
| Neo Performance Materials Inc. 5.00% | GOLD FIELDS 4.35% |
| Iluka Resources Ltd. 4.62% | ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC 4.28% |
| Arafura Rare Earths Ltd. 4.04% | KINROSS GOLD 4.25% |
| Lindian Resources Ltd. 3.85% | COEUR MINING 3.38% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REXC | RING | REXC | RING | REXC | RING | |
| 3 months | −21.8% | +17.9% | −24.0 pts | +15.6 pts | −19.3 pts | +20.3 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +21.9% | not published | +3.9 pts | not published | −2.3 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +45.3% | not published | +28.7 pts | not published | +23.5 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +286.7% | not published | +208.3 pts | not published | +188.5 pts |
| Since launch | −22.0% | +97.9% | −31.4 pts | −543.5 pts | −35.3 pts | −1138.6 pts |
| REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF Holds 41 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF Holds 55 stocks in gold miners, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Sprott | iShares |
| Theme | Rare earth and critical materials | Gold miners |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 16.4% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 99.8% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 41 | 55 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 75.3% | 67.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.39% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.65% | 0.39% |
| Total return, 1 year | −22.0% (since launch on Apr 15, 2026) | +45.3% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −31.4 pts | +28.7 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −35.3 pts | +23.5 pts |
| Below its high | −31.2% | −14.8% |
| Net assets | $65m | $2.5bn |
REXC in plain words
By weight, 0% of REXC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 75% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Since it launched on Apr 15, 2026 the fund returned −22.0% with distributions reinvested against +9.4% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 31.4 pts. It sits 31.2% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.
RING in plain words
By weight, 16% of RING's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 67% of the fund across 55 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +45.3% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 28.7 pts. It sits 14.8% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do REXC and RING hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, REXC or RING?
- REXC has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and RING has 16%, so REXC differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, REXC or RING?
- REXC charges 0.65% a year and RING charges 0.39%, so RING is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, REXC against RING, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/rexc-vs-ring Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.