IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

REXC vs RING: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

REXC and RING hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about REXC and RING

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $71m for Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF and $2.3bn for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF.

REXC on its own →RING on its own →
At a glance
0.0%
REXC in the S&P 500
17.6%
RING in the S&P 500
−39.1%
REXC total return, since launch, Apr 15, 2026
+28.4%
RING total return, 1 year
REXC · 6 months to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of REXC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 75% of the fund · 41 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of REXC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of REXC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

RING · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 82% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
82% of its weight is outside the S&P 50018% of RING's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.18%82%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 68% of the fund · 41 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in82% of its weight is outside the S&P 50018% of RING's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.18%82%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

18% of RING's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

RING costs 0.26 points a year less; RING is far larger, $2.3bn against $71m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

REXC vs RING: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureREXCRING
Return
Total return, 1 yearnot published+28.4%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high46.3%, high on May 6, 202625.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksRare earth and critical materialsGold miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 13.4 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.65%0.39%
Net assets$71m$2.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, REXC and RING hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first REXC RING
Only in one fund ↓
Only in REXC
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. 21.26%
MP Materials Corp. 18.95%
Iluka Resources Ltd. 5.57%
Neo Performance Materials Inc. 5.36%
Sunrise Energy Metals Ltd. 4.57%
USA Rare Earth Inc. 4.34%
Critical Metals Corp. 4.27%
Arafura Rare Earths Ltd. 3.96%
Only in RING
NEWMONT 17.65%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES 12.79%
BARRICK MINING 8.72%
WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS 7.33%
GOLD FIELDS 4.51%
ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC 4.40%
KINROSS GOLD 3.74%
PAN AMERICAN SILVER 3.02%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: REXC vs RING: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowREXCRINGREXCRING
3 months−26.7%+2.4%not measured+3.7 pts vs ACWI
6 months−46.3%−7.2%not measured−9.8 pts vs ACWI
1 year–+28.4%–+13.4 pts vs ACWI
3 years–+233.8%–+156.2 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: REXC Apr 2026 · RING Feb 2012−39.1%+74.0%not measured−293.7 pts vs ACWI

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF · Holds 41 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF · Holds 41 stocks in gold miners, 18% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Sprott iShares
Theme Rare earth and critical materials Gold miners
In the S&P 500 0.0% 17.6%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 99.8%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 41 41
Top ten, share of the fund 74.8% 67.5%
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.39%
Fee for the differing part 0.65% 0.39%
Total return, 1 year −39.1% (since launch, Apr 15, 2026) +28.4%
vs its benchmark not measured +13.4 pts vs ACWI
Below its high −46.3% −25.1%
Net assets $71m $2.3bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

RING flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
REXC

By weight, 0% of REXC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 75% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 15, 2026 the fund returned −39.1% with distributions reinvested. It sits 46.3% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

RING

By weight, 18% of RING's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 68% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +28.4% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 13.4 pts. It sits 25.1% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do REXC and RING hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, REXC or RING?
REXC has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and RING has 18%, so REXC differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, REXC or RING?
REXC charges 0.65% a year and RING charges 0.39%, so RING is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
REXC vs AUMIREXC vs AUAUREXC vs GDMNREXC vs GBUGRING vs EARTRING vs FMTLRING vs WDIGRING vs SETM
Where to next
All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →REXC on its own →RING on its own →REXC holdings →RING dividend history →RING holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
REXC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
REXC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Sprott page for REXC ↗
RING filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
RING prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
iShares page for RING ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, REXC against RING, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/rexc-vs-ring

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.