Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
EART vs GDXJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, EART returned +10.5% to GDXJ's +21.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EART and GDXJNet assets: $47m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF, and $7.0bn on Nov 3, 2026 for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF.
8% of EART's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
0% of GDXJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.
Pair scorecard
GDXJ costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.2 points; GDXJ is far larger, $8.3bn against $47m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | EART | GDXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +10.5% | +21.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 31.8%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 33.3%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Rare earth and critical materials | Gold miners |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.0% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 6.7 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.52% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $47m | $8.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EART and GDXJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | EART | GDXJ | EART | GDXJ |
| 3 months | −15.5% | −4.8% | not measured | −3.5 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | −26.9% | −15.1% | not measured | −17.7 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | +10.5% | +21.7% | not measured | +6.7 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | +74.9% | +210.2% | not measured | +132.6 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: EART Jan 2022 · GDXJ Nov 2009 | +11.4% | +44.7% | not measured | not measured |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
EART
By weight, 8% of EART's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 50 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +10.5% with distributions reinvested. It sits 31.8% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
GDXJ
By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 155 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 6.7 pts. It sits 33.3% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do EART and GDXJ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EART against GDXJ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/eart-vs-gdxj
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). EART against GDXJ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/eart-vs-gdxj
[EART against GDXJ (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/eart-vs-gdxj)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.