Data as of .
EART vs GDXJ: which is really different?
EART and GDXJ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and GDXJ returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: GDXJ scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EART and GDXJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EART | Only in GDXJ |
|---|---|
| FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC 5.40% | Coeur Mining Inc 6.84% |
| ANGLO AMERICAN PLC 5.36% | Alamos Gold Inc 6.53% |
| SOUTHERN COPPER CORP 5.02% | Equinox Gold Corp 6.04% |
| GRUPO MEXICO SAB DE CV-SER B 4.87% | Endeavour Mining Plc 5.64% |
| RIO TINTO PLC 4.53% | Iamgold Corp 5.14% |
| ANTOFAGASTA PLC 4.42% | Industrias Penoles Sab De Cv 2.59% |
| VALTERRA PLATINUM LIMITED 4.15% | Hecla Mining Co 2.43% |
| SUMITOMO METAL MINING CO LTD 4.07% | First Majestic Silver Corp 2.39% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EART | GDXJ | EART | GDXJ | EART | GDXJ | |
| 3 months | −8.0% | +16.1% | −10.3 pts | +13.8 pts | −5.5 pts | +18.5 pts |
| 6 months | +7.6% | +18.8% | −10.5 pts | +0.7 pts | −16.7 pts | −5.5 pts |
| 1 year | +34.5% | +45.2% | +17.9 pts | +28.7 pts | +12.7 pts | +23.5 pts |
| 3 years | +82.2% | +274.9% | +3.8 pts | +196.5 pts | −16.0 pts | +176.7 pts |
| Since launch | +30.0% | +64.0% | −57.3 pts | −739.5 pts | −85.2 pts | −1626.2 pts |
| EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF Holds 56 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF Holds 157 stocks in gold miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | VanEck |
| Theme | Rare earth and critical materials | Gold miners |
| In the S&P 500 | 8.2% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.8% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 56 | 157 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 45.4% | 41.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.52% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.59% | 0.52% |
| Total return, 1 year | +34.5% | +45.2% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +17.9 pts | +28.7 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +12.7 pts | +23.5 pts |
| Below its high | −20.4% | −20.3% |
| Net assets | $42m | $9.2bn |
EART in plain words
By weight, 8% of EART's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 45% of the fund across 56 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +34.5% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 17.9 pts. It sits 20.4% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
GDXJ in plain words
By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 157 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +45.2% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 28.7 pts. It sits 20.3% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do EART and GDXJ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, EART or GDXJ?
- EART has 8% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GDXJ has 0%, so GDXJ differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, EART or GDXJ?
- EART charges 0.59% a year and GDXJ charges 0.52%, so GDXJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EART against GDXJ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/eart-vs-gdxj Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.