Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

GDMN vs SETM: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GDMN returned +11.8% to SETM's +3.9%; 1% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GDMN and SETM

Net assets: $221m on Aug 31, 2026 for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund, and $421m on Nov 4, 2026 for Sprott Critical Materials ETF.

At a glance
11.7%
GDMN in the S&P 500
9.1%
SETM in the S&P 500
+11.8%
GDMN total return, 1 year
+3.9%
SETM total return, 1 year
GDMN · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 88% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
88% of its weight is outside the S&P 50012% of GDMN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 88% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.12%88%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 55% of the fund · 54 holdings as filed for Aug 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in88% of its weight is outside the S&P 50012% of GDMN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 88% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.12%88%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

12% of GDMN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 88% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.

SETM · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 91% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
91% of its weight is outside the S&P 5009% of SETM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.9%91%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 40% of the fund · 156 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in91% of its weight is outside the S&P 5009% of SETM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.9%91%9% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

9% of SETM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

GDMN costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.9 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

GDMN vs SETM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureGDMNSETM
Return
Total return, 1 year+11.8%+3.9%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high44.7%, high on Jan 28, 202637.4%, high on Jan 28, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksGold minersRare earth and critical materials
Against the S&P 500, 1 yearbehind by 10.9 pts
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+14.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 10.9 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.45%0.65%
Net assets, GDMN as of Aug 31, 2026 and SETM as of Nov 4, 2026$221m$421m
Holdings
Holdings in common1%

Method

Risk and return

Feb 10, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026 · 194 weekly returns
GDMN SETM
Return
Total return edge GDMN +247.0% +34.3%
Annualized edge GDMN +39.6% +8.2%
Price return edge GDMN +167.9% +26.5%
Risk
Volatility edge SETM 50.8% 36.2%
Max drawdown edge SETM −50.9% −39.0%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge GDMN 0.82 0.27
Sortino edge GDMN 1.32 0.39
Calmar edge GDMN 0.78 0.21
Reading

From Feb 2023 to Oct 2026, GDMN returned more: +247.0% to +34.3%. SETM swung less: 36.2% to 50.8%. SETM fell less at its worst: −39.0% to −50.9%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GDMN vs SETM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureGDMNSETMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+247.0%+34.3%GDMNPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+39.6%+8.2%GDMNTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+167.9%+26.5%GDMNPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility50.8%36.2%SETMSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation31.4%25.6%SETMLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−50.9%−39.0%SETMDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.820.27GDMNReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.320.39GDMNReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.780.21GDMNAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 194 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

1%

By the books each fund has filed, GDMN and SETM hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

1% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GDMN SETM
COMPANIA DE MINAS BUENAVENTURA SA 1.22% 2.78%
GOGOLD RESOURCES INC 0.14% 0.42%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GDMN
NEWMONT CORP 11.66%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD 7.23%
BARRICK MINING CORP 7.09%
ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC 5.95%
KINROSS GOLD CORP 4.82%
GOLD FIELDS LTD 4.58%
WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP 4.04%
FRANCO-NEVADA CORP 3.75%
Only in SETM
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 5.47%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. 4.87%
Cameco Corp. 4.81%
NAC Kazatomprom JSC 4.15%
Teck Resources Ltd. 3.95%
Albemarle Corp. 3.61%
Hecla Mining Co. 3.42%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA 3.40%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: GDMN vs SETM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowGDMNSETMGDMNSETM
3 months−5.4%−21.2%not measured−21.1 pts vs VOO
6 months−22.4%−35.3%not measured−40.3 pts vs VOO
1 year+11.8%+3.9%not measured−10.9 pts vs VOO
3 years+294.4%+57.7%not measured−25.6 pts vs VOO
Since launchNot the same days: GDMN Dec 2021 · SETM Feb 2023+269.7%+29.5%not measured−64.0 pts vs VOO

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund · Holds 54 stocks in gold miners, 12% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF · Holds 156 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Gold miners Rare earth and critical materials
In the S&P 500 11.7% 9.1%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.8% 99.8%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 54 156
Top ten, share of the fund 55.4% 40.1%
Expense ratio 0.45% 0.65%
Fee for the differing part 0.45% 0.65%
Total return, 1 year +11.8% +3.9%
vs its benchmark not measured −10.9 pts vs VOO
Below its high −44.7% −37.4%
Net assets, GDMN as of Aug 31, 2026 and SETM as of Nov 4, 2026 $221m $421m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

1% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GDMN

By weight, 12% of GDMN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 54 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +11.8% with distributions reinvested. It sits 44.7% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

SETM

By weight, 9% of SETM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 156 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.9% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Total Return Index, so a holder was behind by 10.9 pts. It sits 37.4% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do GDMN and SETM hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, GDMN or SETM?
GDMN has 12% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SETM has 9%, so GDMN differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, GDMN or SETM?
GDMN charges 0.45% a year and SETM charges 0.65%, so GDMN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GDMN against SETM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdmn-vs-setm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.