Data as of .
SETM vs SGDJ: which is really different?
SETM and SGDJ hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and SGDJ returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: SGDJ scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
1% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SETM and SGDJ hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SETM | SGDJ |
|---|---|---|
| Endeavour Silver Corp. | 0.99% | 4.45% |
| Philex Mining Corp. | 0.04% | 1.65% |
| Only in SETM | Only in SGDJ |
|---|---|
| Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 5.00% | Minerals 260 Ltd. 5.42% |
| Cameco Corp. 4.91% | Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd. 5.33% |
| Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. 4.73% | Seabridge Gold Inc. 4.84% |
| PLS Group Ltd. 4.05% | Turk Altin Isletmeleri AS 4.82% |
| NAC Kazatomprom JSC 3.57% | Kingsgate Consolidated Ltd. 4.55% |
| Hecla Mining Co. 3.46% | Catalyst Metals Ltd. 4.51% |
| First Majestic Silver Corp. 3.42% | West African Resources Ltd. 4.46% |
| Albemarle Corp. 3.37% | Fortuna Mining Corp. 4.38% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SETM | SGDJ | SETM | SGDJ | SETM | SGDJ | |
| 3 months | −9.0% | +16.5% | −11.3 pts | +14.3 pts | −6.5 pts | +19.0 pts |
| 6 months | +5.4% | +24.0% | −12.6 pts | +5.9 pts | −18.8 pts | −0.3 pts |
| 1 year | +37.9% | +64.3% | +21.4 pts | +47.7 pts | +16.2 pts | +42.5 pts |
| 3 years | +82.1% | +317.7% | +3.7 pts | +239.3 pts | −16.1 pts | +219.5 pts |
| Since launch | +61.6% | +444.2% | −30.1 pts | +98.0 pts | −74.6 pts | −199.0 pts |
| SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF Holds 156 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF Holds 31 stocks in gold miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Sprott | Sprott |
| Theme | Rare earth and critical materials | Gold miners |
| In the S&P 500 | 8.4% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.8% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 156 | 31 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 39.0% | 47.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.50% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.65% | 0.50% |
| Total return, 1 year | +37.9% | +64.3% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +21.4 pts | +47.7 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +16.2 pts | +42.5 pts |
| Below its high | −21.8% | −16.1% |
| Net assets | $568m | $366m |
SETM in plain words
By weight, 8% of SETM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 39% of the fund across 156 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +37.9% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 21.4 pts. It sits 21.8% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.
SGDJ in plain words
By weight, 0% of SGDJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 31 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +64.3% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 47.7 pts. It sits 16.1% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do SETM and SGDJ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, SETM or SGDJ?
- SETM has 8% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SGDJ has 0%, so SGDJ differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, SETM or SGDJ?
- SETM charges 0.65% a year and SGDJ charges 0.50%, so SGDJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SETM against SGDJ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/setm-vs-sgdj Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.