Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

SETM vs SGDJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SETM returned +3.9% to SGDJ's +26.2%; 1% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SETM and SGDJ

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $421m for Sprott Critical Materials ETF and $315m for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF.

At a glance
9.1%
SETM in the S&P 500
0.0%
SGDJ in the S&P 500
+3.9%
SETM total return, 1 year
+26.2%
SGDJ total return, 1 year
SETM · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 91% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
91% of its weight is outside the S&P 5009% of SETM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.9%91%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 40% of the fund · 156 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in91% of its weight is outside the S&P 5009% of SETM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.9%91%9% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

9% of SETM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

SGDJ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of SGDJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 47% of the fund · 30 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of SGDJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of SGDJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

SGDJ costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 22.3 points; SETM is 1.3 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

SETM vs SGDJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureSETMSGDJ
Return
Total return, 1 year+3.9%+26.2%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high37.4%, high on Jan 28, 202631.7%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksRare earth and critical materialsGold miners
Against the S&P 500, 1 yearbehind by 10.9 pts
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+14.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 10.9 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.65%0.50%
Net assets$421m$315m
Holdings
Holdings in common1%

Method

Risk and return

Feb 10, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026 · 194 weekly returns
SETM SGDJ
Return
Total return edge SGDJ +34.3% +195.7%
Annualized edge SGDJ +8.2% +33.7%
Price return edge SGDJ +26.5% +146.0%
Risk
Volatility edge SETM 36.2% 43.6%
Max drawdown edge SGDJ (slight) −39.0% −37.8%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SGDJ 0.27 0.78
Sortino edge SGDJ 0.39 1.24
Calmar edge SGDJ 0.21 0.89
Reading

From Feb 2023 to Oct 2026, SGDJ returned more: +195.7% to +34.3%. SETM swung less: 36.2% to 43.6%. SGDJ fell slightly less at its worst: −37.8% to −39.0%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: SETM vs SGDJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureSETMSGDJEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+34.3%+195.7%SGDJPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+8.2%+33.7%SGDJTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+26.5%+146.0%SGDJPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility36.2%43.6%SETMSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation25.6%27.4%SETM (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−39.0%−37.8%SGDJ (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.270.78SGDJReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.391.24SGDJReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.210.89SGDJAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 194 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

1%

By the books each fund has filed, SETM and SGDJ hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

1% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first SETM SGDJ
Endeavour Silver Corp. 0.95% 4.33%
Philex Mining Corp. 0.03% 1.53%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in SETM
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 5.47%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. 4.87%
Cameco Corp. 4.81%
NAC Kazatomprom JSC 4.15%
Teck Resources Ltd. 3.95%
Albemarle Corp. 3.61%
Hecla Mining Co. 3.42%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA 3.40%
Only in SGDJ
Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd. 5.28%
Minerals 260 Ltd. 5.21%
Seabridge Gold Inc. 5.03%
West African Resources Ltd. 4.91%
Allied Gold Corp. 4.66%
Emerald Resources NL 4.54%
Fortuna Mining Corp. 4.46%
Turk Altin Isletmeleri AS 4.42%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: SETM vs SGDJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowSETMSGDJSETMSGDJ
3 months−21.2%−6.7%−21.1 pts vs VOOnot measured
6 months−35.3%−14.2%−40.3 pts vs VOOnot measured
1 year+3.9%+26.2%−10.9 pts vs VOOnot measured
3 years+57.7%+232.8%−25.6 pts vs VOOnot measured
Since launchNot the same days: SETM Feb 2023 · SGDJ Mar 2015+29.5%+342.6%−64.0 pts vs VOOnot measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF · Holds 156 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF · Holds 30 stocks in gold miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Sprott Sprott
Theme Rare earth and critical materials Gold miners
In the S&P 500 9.1% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.8% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 156 30
Top ten, share of the fund 40.1% 47.2%
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.50%
Fee for the differing part 0.65% 0.50%
Total return, 1 year +3.9% +26.2%
vs its benchmark −10.9 pts vs VOO not measured
Below its high −37.4% −31.7%
Net assets $421m $315m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

1% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
SETM

By weight, 9% of SETM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 156 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.9% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Total Return Index, so a holder was behind by 10.9 pts. It sits 37.4% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

SGDJ

By weight, 0% of SGDJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 30 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +26.2% with distributions reinvested. It sits 31.7% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do SETM and SGDJ hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, SETM or SGDJ?
SETM has 9% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SGDJ has 0%, so SGDJ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, SETM or SGDJ?
SETM charges 0.65% a year and SGDJ charges 0.50%, so SGDJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SETM against SGDJ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/setm-vs-sgdj

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.