Data as of .
FITE vs LFSC: which is really different?
FITE and LFSC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and LFSC returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: LFSC scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FITE and LFSC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FITE | Only in LFSC |
|---|---|
| RAPID7 INC 2.23% | Travere Therapeutics Inc 7.66% |
| OKTA INC 2.14% | Cogent Biosciences Inc 7.52% |
| QUALYS INC 2.09% | LivaNova PLC 7.11% |
| ZSCALER INC 2.05% | Spyre Therapeutics Inc 6.41% |
| SENTINELONE INC CLASS A 2.03% | Guardant Health Inc 5.51% |
| CLOUDFLARE INC CLASS A 1.97% | Mirum Pharmaceuticals Inc 4.92% |
| CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC A 1.97% | Corcept Therapeutics Inc 4.79% |
| RUBRIK INC A 1.96% | United Therapeutics Corp 4.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 17, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FITE | LFSC | FITE | LFSC | FITE | LFSC | |
| 3 months | +2.7% | +8.7% | +0.5 pts | +6.5 pts | +5.2 pts | +11.2 pts |
| 6 months | +25.9% | +36.0% | +7.9 pts | +17.9 pts | +1.7 pts | +11.7 pts |
| 1 year | +30.7% | +53.0% | +14.1 pts | +36.5 pts | +8.9 pts | +31.3 pts |
| 3 years | +130.9% | not published | +52.5 pts | not published | +32.8 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +285.5% | +81.3% | +59.9 pts | +44.3 pts | −101.9 pts | +30.9 pts |
| FITE State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P Kensho Future Security ETF Holds 80 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 27% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF Holds 39 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | State Street | F/m |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 27.1% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 95.3% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 11.2% | 0.6% |
| Holdings | 80 | 39 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 20.2% | 54.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | 0.54% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.47% | 0.54% |
| Total return, 1 year | +30.7% | +53.0% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +14.1 pts | +36.5 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +8.9 pts | +31.3 pts |
| Below its high | −8.2% | −6.8% |
| Net assets | $151m | $105m |
FITE in plain words
By weight, 27% of FITE's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 20% of the fund across 80 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 17, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +30.7% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 14.1 pts. It sits 8.2% below its all-time high of Aug 13, 2026.
LFSC in plain words
By weight, 0% of LFSC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +53.0% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 36.5 pts. It sits 6.8% below its all-time high of Aug 19, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do FITE and LFSC hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, FITE or LFSC?
- FITE has 27% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LFSC has 0%, so LFSC differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, FITE or LFSC?
- FITE charges 0.45% a year and LFSC charges 0.54%, so FITE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FITE against LFSC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fite-vs-lfsc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.