Data as of .
AOTG vs LFSC: which is really different?
AOTG and LFSC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and LFSC returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: LFSC scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AOTG and LFSC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in AOTG | Only in LFSC |
|---|---|
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 15.39% | Travere Therapeutics Inc 7.66% |
| NVIDIA Corp 10.47% | Cogent Biosciences Inc 7.52% |
| Micron Technology Inc 9.53% | LivaNova PLC 7.11% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 6.78% | Spyre Therapeutics Inc 6.41% |
| AppLovin Corp 5.31% | Guardant Health Inc 5.51% |
| Toast Inc 4.65% | Mirum Pharmaceuticals Inc 4.92% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.40% | Corcept Therapeutics Inc 4.79% |
| Alphabet Inc 4.11% | United Therapeutics Corp 4.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AOTG | LFSC | AOTG | LFSC | AOTG | LFSC | |
| 3 months | +2.7% | +8.7% | +0.4 pts | +6.5 pts | +5.2 pts | +11.2 pts |
| 6 months | +37.5% | +36.0% | +19.5 pts | +17.9 pts | +13.3 pts | +11.7 pts |
| 1 year | +22.3% | +53.0% | +5.8 pts | +36.5 pts | +0.6 pts | +31.3 pts |
| 3 years | +120.6% | not published | +42.2 pts | not published | +22.4 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +168.9% | +81.3% | +57.1 pts | +44.3 pts | +8.5 pts | +30.9 pts |
| AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF Holds 41 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 77% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF Holds 39 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | AOT Invest | F/m |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 77.4% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 69.1% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 67.7% | 0.6% |
| Holdings | 41 | 39 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 68.4% | 54.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.54% |
| Fee for the differing part | 1.09% | 0.54% |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.3% | +53.0% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +5.8 pts | +36.5 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +0.6 pts | +31.3 pts |
| Below its high | −0.6% | −6.8% |
| Net assets | $105m | $105m |
AOTG in plain words
By weight, 77% of AOTG's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 69%. The top ten holdings are 68% of the fund across 41 positions, as filed for May 29, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +22.3% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.8 pts.
LFSC in plain words
By weight, 0% of LFSC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +53.0% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 36.5 pts. It sits 6.8% below its all-time high of Aug 19, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do AOTG and LFSC hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, AOTG or LFSC?
- AOTG has 77% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LFSC has 0%, so LFSC differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, AOTG or LFSC?
- AOTG charges 0.75% a year and LFSC charges 0.54%, so LFSC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AOTG against LFSC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aotg-vs-lfsc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.