Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
AOTG vs XT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, AOTG returned +3.2% to XT's +23.4%; 20% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AOTG and XT
Net assets: $105m on Aug 31, 2026 for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF, and $4.0bn on Nov 4, 2026 for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF.
74% of AOTG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 26% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
65% of XT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 35% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
Pair scorecard
XT costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 20.2 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | AOTG | XT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +3.2% | +23.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 14.7%, high on Oct 7, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.4% | +15.0% |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 11.2 pts | ahead by 8.4 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.46% |
| Net assets, AOTG as of Aug 31, 2026 and XT as of Nov 4, 2026 | $105m | $4.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 20% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 64% | 36% |
How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 114 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed
Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Jul 8, 2022 to Oct 30, 2026 · 225 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: AOTG against GUSA, Jul 8, 2022 to Oct 30, 2026; XT against ACWI, Apr 2, 2015 to Oct 30, 2026.
From Jul 2022 to Oct 2026, AOTG returned more: +127.5% to +84.6%. XT swung less: 19.6% to 27.9%. XT fell less at its worst: −19.0% to −29.2%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | AOTG | XT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +127.5% | +84.6% | AOTG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +20.9% | +15.2% | AOTG | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +127.5% | +67.7% | AOTG | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 27.9% | 19.6% | XT | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 18.4% | 13.4% | XT | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −29.2% | −19.0% | XT | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 213.3% | 123.1% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 136.9% | 108.5% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.56 | 1.11 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.75 | 0.89 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.66 | 0.59 | AOTG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.00 | 0.87 | AOTG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.118 | 0.103 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.72 | 0.80 | XT | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | GUSA | ACWI | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −2.0% a year | +1.3% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −0.29 | 0.68 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −15.4% to +11.4% | −2.3% to +4.9% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.32 | 0.35 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 16.5% | 6.5% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 225 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AOTG and XT hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
20% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | AOTG | XT | AOTG | XT |
| 3 months | −7.6% | +2.8% | −7.1 pts vs GUSA | +4.1 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | −1.1% | +7.5% | −5.8 pts vs GUSA | +4.9 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | +3.2% | +23.4% | −11.2 pts vs GUSA | +8.4 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | +101.5% | +78.5% | +19.6 pts vs GUSA | +0.9 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: AOTG Jun 2022 · XT Mar 2015 | +139.7% | +293.9% | +29.2 pts vs GUSA | +69.3 pts vs ACWI |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
20% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.2% with distributions reinvested against +14.4% for its benchmark, the Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts.
By weight, 74% of AOTG's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 69%. The top ten holdings are 64% of the fund across 43 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. It sits 14.7% below its all-time high of Oct 7, 2026.
XT
By weight, 65% of XT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 70%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 196 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 8.4 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do AOTG and XT hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AOTG against XT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aotg-vs-xt
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). AOTG against XT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aotg-vs-xt
[AOTG against XT (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aotg-vs-xt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.