Do AOTG and QQQJ hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, AOTG or QQQJ?

AOTG has 74% of its weight in S&P 500 names and QQQJ has 47%, so QQQJ differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, AOTG or QQQJ?

AOTG charges 0.75% a year and QQQJ charges 0.15%, so QQQJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

AOTG vs QQQJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, AOTG returned +3.2% to QQQJ's +25.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AOTG and QQQJ

Net assets: $105m on Aug 31, 2026 for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF, and $1.2bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF.

AOTG on its own →QQQJ on its own →

At a glance

74.4%

AOTG in the S&P 500

46.7%

QQQJ in the S&P 500

+3.2%

AOTG total return, 1 year

+25.2%

QQQJ total return, 1 year

AOTG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 26% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

74% of AOTG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 26% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.

QQQJ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 53% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

47% of QQQJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 53% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

QQQJ costs 0.60 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 22.0 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

AOTG vs QQQJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	AOTG	QQQJ
Return
Measure	AOTG	QQQJ
Total return, 1 year	+3.2%	+25.2%
Drawdown
Measure	AOTG	QQQJ
Below its all-time high	14.7%, high on Oct 7, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	AOTG	QQQJ
What it tracks	Broad innovation and megatrends	Broad innovation and megatrends
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+14.4%	+14.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	behind by 11.2 pts	ahead by 10.4 pts
Cost and size
Measure	AOTG	QQQJ
Expense ratio	0.75%	0.15%
Net assets, AOTG as of Aug 31, 2026 and QQQJ as of Nov 3, 2026	$105m	$1.2bn
Holdings
Measure	AOTG	QQQJ
Holdings in common	0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	64%	20%

Method

Risk and return

Jul 8, 2022 to Oct 30, 2026 · 225 weekly returns

AOTG QQQJ

Return

Total return edge AOTG +127.5% +86.8%

Annualized edge AOTG +20.9% +15.5%

Price return edge AOTG +127.5% +80.3%

Risk

Volatility edge QQQJ 27.9% 19.2%

Max drawdown edge QQQJ −29.2% −21.0%

Downside capture 136.9% 113.1%

Beta 1.56 1.17

Risk-adjusted

Sharpe edge AOTG (slight) 0.66 0.62

Sortino edge AOTG (slight) 1.00 0.92

Treynor 0.118 0.069

Calmar edge QQQJ (slight) 0.72 0.74

Against the benchmark

Alpha −2.0% a year −5.5% a year

Alpha t-stat −0.29 −1.48

Information ratio 0.32 −0.37

Tracking error 16.5% 9.4%

Each against its own benchmark: AOTG against GUSA, Jul 8, 2022 to Oct 30, 2026; QQQJ against IWV, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 30, 2026.

Reading

From Jul 2022 to Oct 2026, AOTG returned more: +127.5% to +86.8%. QQQJ swung less: 19.2% to 27.9%. QQQJ fell less at its worst: −21.0% to −29.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: AOTG vs QQQJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	AOTG	QQQJ	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	+127.5%	+86.8%	AOTG	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized	+20.9%	+15.5%	AOTG	Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return	+127.5%	+80.3%	AOTG	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility	27.9%	19.2%	QQQJ	Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation	18.4%	12.8%	QQQJ	Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown	−29.2%	−21.0%	QQQJ	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture	213.3%	113.3%		Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture	136.9%	113.1%		Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta	1.56	1.17	Not an edge	How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared	0.75	0.82	Not an edge	Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe	0.66	0.62	AOTG (slight)	Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino	1.00	0.92	AOTG (slight)	Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor	0.118	0.069		Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar	0.72	0.74	QQQJ (slight)	Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
Benchmark	GUSA	IWV		The ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha	−2.0% a year	−5.5% a year	Not significant	Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat	−0.29	−1.48	Not an edge	How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range	−15.4% to +11.4%	−12.7% to +1.8%	Includes zero	The 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio	0.32	−0.37		Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error	16.5%	9.4%	Not an edge	How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 225 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, AOTG and QQQJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AOTG QQQJ

Only in one fund ↓

Only in AOTG

Advanced Micro Devices Inc 12.32%

NVIDIA Corp 10.94%

Micron Technology Inc 10.16%

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 6.72%

Toast Inc 4.61%

Microsoft Corp 4.49%

Amazon.com Inc 4.22%

Alphabet Inc 3.92%

Only in QQQJ

Natera Inc 2.83%

eBay Inc 2.67%

Revolution Medicines Inc 2.10%

NetApp Inc 1.89%

Biogen Inc 1.86%

Illumina Inc 1.82%

Steel Dynamics Inc 1.79%

Elbit Systems Ltd 1.79%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: AOTG vs QQQJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	AOTG	QQQJ	AOTG	QQQJ
3 months	−7.6%	−1.2%	−7.1 pts vs GUSA	−0.9 pts vs IWV
6 months	−1.1%	+6.2%	−5.8 pts vs GUSA	+1.3 pts vs IWV
1 year	+3.2%	+25.2%	−11.2 pts vs GUSA	+10.4 pts vs IWV
3 years	+101.5%	+91.2%	+19.6 pts vs GUSA	+10.2 pts vs IWV
Since launchNot the same days: AOTG Jun 2022 · QQQJ Oct 2020	+139.7%	+74.3%	+29.2 pts vs GUSA	−53.2 pts vs IWV

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF · Holds 43 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 74% of its weight in S&P 500 companies QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF · Holds 106 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 47% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer AOT Invest Invesco

Theme Broad innovation and megatrends Broad innovation and megatrends

In the S&P 500 74.4% 46.7%

Active share vs the S&P 500 69.3% 98.6%

In the Nasdaq-100 65.6% 0.0%

Holdings 43 106

Top ten, share of the fund 64.5% 20.3%

Expense ratio 0.75% 0.15%

Fee for the differing part 1.08% 0.15%

Total return, 1 year +3.2% +25.2%

vs its benchmark −11.2 pts vs GUSA +10.4 pts vs IWV

Below its high −14.7% −4.4%

Net assets, AOTG as of Aug 31, 2026 and QQQJ as of Nov 3, 2026 $105m $1.2bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

AOTG

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.2% with distributions reinvested against +14.4% for its benchmark, the Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts.

By weight, 74% of AOTG's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 69%. The top ten holdings are 64% of the fund across 43 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. It sits 14.7% below its all-time high of Oct 7, 2026.

QQQJ

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.2% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, so a holder was ahead by 10.4 pts.

By weight, 47% of QQQJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 20% of the fund across 106 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do AOTG and QQQJ hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, AOTG or QQQJ?: AOTG has 74% of its weight in S&P 500 names and QQQJ has 47%, so QQQJ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, AOTG or QQQJ?: AOTG charges 0.75% a year and QQQJ charges 0.15%, so QQQJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

AOTG vs XT AOTG vs ILDR AOTG vs FDTX AOTG vs FRWD QQQJ vs FDCF QQQJ vs DTEC QQQJ vs FITE QQQJ vs TEKY

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →AOTG on its own →QQQJ on its own →AOTG holdings →QQQJ dividend history →QQQJ holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

AOTG filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

AOTG prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

AOT Invest page for AOTG ↗

QQQJ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

QQQJ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Invesco page for QQQJ ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AOTG against QQQJ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aotg-vs-qqqj

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.