Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

FDCF vs LFSC: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FDCF returned +1.2% to LFSC's +43.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FDCF and LFSC

Net assets: $103m on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF, and $126m on Aug 31, 2026 for F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF.

At a glance
51.4%
FDCF in the S&P 500
0.0%
LFSC in the S&P 500
+1.2%
FDCF total return, 1 year
+43.6%
LFSC total return, 1 year
FDCF · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 49% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
49% of its weight is outside the S&P 50051% of FDCF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 49% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.51%49%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 80% · top ten 54% of the fund · 37 holdings as filed for Aug 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 45% in49% of its weight is outside the S&P 50051% of FDCF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 49% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.51%49%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 80% · Nasdaq-100: 45% in

51% of FDCF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 49% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.

LFSC · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of LFSC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 54% of the fund · 38 holdings as filed for Aug 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of LFSC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of LFSC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

FDCF costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 42.4 points; LFSC is 1.2 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FDCF vs LFSC: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureFDCFLFSC
Return
Total return, 1 year+1.2%+43.6%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high7.2%, high on Oct 6, 20265.7%, high on Aug 19, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBroad innovation and megatrendsBroad innovation and megatrends
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+14.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 28.8 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.50%0.54%
Net assets, as of Aug 31, 2026$101m$126m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

Risk and return

Nov 8, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 103 weekly returns
FDCF LFSC
Return
Total return edge LFSC +21.6% +61.4%
Annualized edge LFSC +10.4% +27.3%
Price return edge LFSC +21.3% +61.4%
Risk
Volatility edge FDCF 20.9% 26.7%
Max drawdown edge FDCF −20.5% −24.4%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge LFSC 0.39 0.89
Sortino edge LFSC 0.56 1.36
Calmar edge LFSC 0.51 1.12
Reading

From Nov 2024 to Oct 2026, LFSC returned more: +61.4% to +21.6%. FDCF swung less: 20.9% to 26.7%. FDCF fell less at its worst: −20.5% to −24.4%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FDCF vs LFSC: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureFDCFLFSCEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+21.6%+61.4%LFSCPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.4%+27.3%LFSCTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+21.3%+61.4%LFSCPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.9%26.7%FDCFSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.3%17.5%FDCFLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−20.5%−24.4%FDCFDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.390.89LFSCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.561.36LFSCReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.511.12LFSCAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 103 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FDCF and LFSC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FDCF LFSC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FDCF
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 10.18%
ALPHABET INC 7.89%
ARISTA NETWORKS INC 6.84%
NVIDIA CORP 5.85%
META PLATFORMS INC 5.59%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.20%
SEA LTD 3.43%
TWILIO INC 3.23%
Only in LFSC
Travere Therapeutics Inc 8.71%
Corcept Therapeutics Inc 6.72%
Spyre Therapeutics Inc 6.70%
LivaNova PLC 6.61%
Cogent Biosciences Inc 6.48%
Mirum Pharmaceuticals Inc 4.32%
Billiontoone Inc 3.86%
Guardant Health Inc 3.81%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: FDCF vs LFSC: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowFDCFLFSCFDCFLFSC
3 months−1.9%−3.8%not measured−3.5 pts vs IWV
6 months−1.2%+16.9%not measured+12.0 pts vs IWV
1 year+1.2%+43.6%not measured+28.8 pts vs IWV
3 years+91.2%–not measured–
Since launchNot the same days: FDCF Jun 2023 · LFSC Oct 2024+94.2%+83.4%not measured+46.4 pts vs IWV

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

FDCF Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF · Holds 37 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 51% of its weight in S&P 500 companies LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF · Holds 38 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Fidelity F/m
Theme Broad innovation and megatrends Broad innovation and megatrends
In the S&P 500 51.4% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 79.6% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 44.7% 0.0%
Holdings 37 38
Top ten, share of the fund 53.9% 54.0%
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.54%
Fee for the differing part 0.63% 0.54%
Total return, 1 year +1.2% +43.6%
vs its benchmark not measured +28.8 pts vs IWV
Below its high −7.2% −5.7%
Net assets, FDCF as of Sep 30, 2026 and LFSC as of Aug 31, 2026 $103m $126m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FDCF

By weight, 51% of FDCF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 80%. The top ten holdings are 54% of the fund across 37 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +1.2% with distributions reinvested. It sits 7.2% below its all-time high of Oct 6, 2026.

LFSC

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +43.6% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Total Return, so a holder was ahead by 28.8 pts.

By weight, 0% of LFSC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 54% of the fund across 38 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. It sits 5.7% below its all-time high of Aug 19, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do FDCF and LFSC hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, FDCF or LFSC?
FDCF has 51% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LFSC has 0%, so LFSC differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, FDCF or LFSC?
FDCF charges 0.50% a year and LFSC charges 0.54%, so FDCF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FDCF against LFSC, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fdcf-vs-lfsc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.