Do DRAM and XME hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or XME?

DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XME has 21%, so XME differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, DRAM or XME?

DRAM charges 0.65% a year and XME charges 0.35%, so XME is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

DRAM vs XME: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

DRAM and XME hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DRAM and XME

Net assets: $20.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Memory ETF, and $3.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF.

DRAM on its own →XME on its own →

At a glance

15.7%

DRAM in the S&P 500

21.4%

XME in the S&P 500

+95.0%

DRAM total return, since launch, Apr 2, 2026

+3.4%

XME total return, 1 year

DRAM · 6 months to Oct 28, 2026 84% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of DRAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

XME · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 79% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

21% of XME's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 79% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

Pair scorecard

XME costs 0.30 points a year less; DRAM is 5.1 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

DRAM vs XME: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	DRAM	XME
Return
Measure	DRAM	XME
Total return, 1 year	not published	+3.4%
Drawdown
Measure	DRAM	XME
Below its all-time high	33.0%, high on Jun 22, 2026	23.6%, high on Jun 2, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	DRAM	XME
What it tracks	Memory and storage	Miners and metals
Against the S&P 500, 1 year		behind by 10.3 pts
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year		+13.7%
Against its benchmark, 1 year		behind by 10.3 pts
Cost and size
Measure	DRAM	XME
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$19.2bn	$3.8bn
Holdings
Measure	DRAM	XME
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, DRAM and XME hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DRAM XME

Only in one fund ↓

Only in DRAM

SK hynix Inc 15.89%

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 14.37%

Sandisk Corp 5.21%

Kioxia Holdings Corp 4.36%

Western Digital Corp 4.30%

Seagate Technology Holdings PL 4.19%

GigaDevice Semiconductor Inc 3.07%

Micron Technology Inc 2.03%

Only in XME

CLEVELAND CLIFFS INC 6.46%

RELIANCE INC 6.15%

NUCOR CORP 5.89%

STEEL DYNAMICS INC 5.76%

COMMERCIAL METALS CO 5.16%

ROYAL GOLD INC 5.12%

NEWMONT CORP 4.91%

FREEPORT MCMORAN INC 4.86%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: DRAM vs XME: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	DRAM	XME	DRAM	XME
3 months	+20.7%	+3.9%	not measured	−2.2 pts vs IVV
6 months	+41.6%	−11.5%	not measured	−20.6 pts vs IVV
1 year	–	+3.4%	–	−10.3 pts vs IVV
3 years	–	+108.2%	–	+12.8 pts vs IVV
Since launchNot the same days: DRAM Apr 2026 · XME Jun 2006	+95.0%	+189.8%	not measured	not measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF · Holds 12 stocks in memory and storage, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies XME State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF · Holds 38 stocks in miners and metals, 21% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Roundhill State Street

Theme Memory and storage Miners and metals

In the S&P 500 15.7% 21.4%

Active share vs the S&P 500 96.8% 99.6%

In the Nasdaq-100 15.7% 0.0%

Holdings 12 38

Top ten, share of the fund 56.4% 53.3%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.35%

Fee for the differing part 0.67% 0.35%

Total return, 1 year +95.0% (since launch, Apr 2, 2026) +3.4%

vs its benchmark not measured −10.3 pts vs IVV

Below its high −33.0% −23.6%

Net assets, DRAM as of Oct 28, 2026 and XME as of Oct 27, 2026 $20.6bn $3.8bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

DRAM

By weight, 16% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 12 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +95.0% with distributions reinvested. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

XME

By weight, 21% of XME's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 38 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was behind by 10.3 pts. It sits 23.6% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do DRAM and XME hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or XME?: DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XME has 21%, so XME differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, DRAM or XME?: DRAM charges 0.65% a year and XME charges 0.35%, so XME is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

DRAM vs ARTY DRAM vs XT DRAM vs KWEB DRAM vs SIL XME vs METL XME vs EART XME vs NIKL XME vs FMTL

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →DRAM on its own →XME on its own →DRAM holdings →XME dividend history →XME holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

DRAM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

DRAM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Roundhill page for DRAM ↗

XME filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

XME prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

State Street website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DRAM against XME, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/dram-vs-xme

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.