Data as of .
NIKL vs XME: which is really different?
NIKL and XME hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XME returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: NIKL scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, NIKL and XME hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in NIKL | Only in XME |
|---|---|
| ANTAM Persero Tbk PT 14.86% | CLEVELAND CLIFFS INC 5.36% |
| Nickel Industries Ltd. 11.93% | RELIANCE INC 5.12% |
| Merdeka Battery Materials Tbk PT 11.52% | STEEL DYNAMICS INC 5.07% |
| IGO Ltd. 8.25% | NUCOR CORP 5.00% |
| Talon Metals Corp. 6.48% | NEWMONT CORP 4.97% |
| Vale Indonesia Tbk PT 4.75% | ROYAL GOLD INC 4.93% |
| Trimegah Bangun Persada Tbk PT 4.62% | COEUR MINING INC 4.88% |
| Sunrise Energy Metals Ltd. 4.24% | FREEPORT MCMORAN INC 4.87% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIKL | XME | NIKL | XME | NIKL | XME | |
| 3 months | +0.7% | −7.1% | −1.6 pts | −9.3 pts | +3.1 pts | −4.6 pts |
| 6 months | −1.4% | +7.0% | −19.4 pts | −11.1 pts | −25.6 pts | −17.3 pts |
| 1 year | +10.8% | +22.4% | −5.8 pts | +5.9 pts | −11.0 pts | +0.7 pts |
| 3 years | −7.1% | +110.4% | −85.5 pts | +32.0 pts | −105.3 pts | +12.2 pts |
| Since launch | −12.2% | +149.5% | −115.1 pts | −654.1 pts | −152.3 pts | −1540.8 pts |
| NIKL Sprott Nickel Miners ETF Holds 26 stocks in miners and metals, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | XME State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Metals & Mining ETF Holds 41 stocks in miners and metals, 18% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Sprott | State Street |
| Theme | Miners and metals | Miners and metals |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 18.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 99.6% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 26 | 41 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 74.4% | 46.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.35% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.75% | 0.35% |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.8% | +22.4% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −5.8 pts | +5.9 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −11.0 pts | +0.7 pts |
| Below its high | −30.3% | −18.1% |
| Net assets | $57m | $4.4bn |
NIKL in plain words
By weight, 0% of NIKL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 74% of the fund across 26 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +10.8% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.8 pts. It sits 30.3% below its all-time high of Jan 26, 2026.
XME in plain words
By weight, 18% of XME's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +22.4% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.9 pts. It sits 18.1% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do NIKL and XME hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, NIKL or XME?
- NIKL has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XME has 18%, so NIKL differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, NIKL or XME?
- NIKL charges 0.75% a year and XME charges 0.35%, so XME is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, NIKL against XME, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nikl-vs-xme Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.