Do DRAM and SIL hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or SIL?

DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SIL has 0%, so SIL differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, DRAM or SIL?

DRAM and SIL both charge 0.65% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

DRAM vs SIL: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

DRAM and SIL hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DRAM and SIL

Net assets: $20.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Memory ETF, and $4.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Silver Miners ETF.

DRAM on its own →SIL on its own →

At a glance

15.7%

DRAM in the S&P 500

0.0%

SIL in the S&P 500

+95.0%

DRAM total return, since launch, Apr 2, 2026

+18.3%

SIL total return, 1 year

DRAM · 6 months to Oct 28, 2026 84% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of DRAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

SIL · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of SIL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.65% a year; DRAM is 5.2 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

DRAM vs SIL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	DRAM	SIL
Return
Measure	DRAM	SIL
Total return, 1 year	not published	+18.3%
Drawdown
Measure	DRAM	SIL
Below its all-time high	33.0%, high on Jun 22, 2026	34.2%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	DRAM	SIL
What it tracks	Memory and storage	Silver miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year		+13.4%
Against its benchmark, 1 year		ahead by 4.9 pts
Cost and size
Measure	DRAM	SIL
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.65%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026	$23.0bn	$4.4bn
Holdings
Measure	DRAM	SIL
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 10, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026 · 28 weekly returns

DRAM SIL

Return

Total return edge DRAM +45.1% −23.3%

Price return edge DRAM +45.1% −23.4%

Risk

Max drawdown edge SIL −39.4% −28.9%

Reading

DRAM returned more: +45.1% to −23.3%. SIL fell less at its worst: −28.9% to −39.4%.

Full scorecard

3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: DRAM vs SIL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	DRAM	SIL	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	+45.1%	−23.3%	DRAM	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Price return	+45.1%	−23.4%	DRAM	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Max drawdown	−39.4%	−28.9%	SIL	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 28 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, DRAM and SIL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DRAM SIL

Only in one fund ↓

Only in DRAM

SK hynix Inc 15.89%

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 14.37%

Sandisk Corp 5.21%

Kioxia Holdings Corp 4.36%

Western Digital Corp 4.30%

Seagate Technology Holdings PL 4.19%

GigaDevice Semiconductor Inc 3.07%

Micron Technology Inc 2.03%

Only in SIL

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. 22.38%

Pan American Silver Corp. 12.54%

COEUR MINING, INC. 10.59%

INDUSTRIAS PENOLES, S.A.B. DE C.V. 5.21%

HECLA MINING COMPANY 4.63%

FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP. 4.47%

FRESNILLO PLC 4.30%

Compania de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. 4.18%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: DRAM vs SIL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	DRAM	SIL	DRAM	SIL
3 months	+20.7%	+6.3%	not measured	+1.9 pts vs ACWI
6 months	+41.6%	−10.2%	not measured	−17.6 pts vs ACWI
1 year	–	+18.3%	–	+4.9 pts vs ACWI
3 years	–	+227.9%	–	+139.0 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: DRAM Apr 2026 · SIL Apr 2010	+95.0%	+109.0%	not measured	−286.2 pts vs ACWI

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF · Holds 12 stocks in memory and storage, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF · Holds 39 stocks in silver miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Roundhill Global X

Theme Memory and storage Silver miners

In the S&P 500 15.7% 0.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 96.8% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 15.7% 0.0%

Holdings 12 39

Top ten, share of the fund 56.4% 76.3%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.65%

Fee for the differing part 0.67% 0.65%

Total return, 1 year +95.0% (since launch, Apr 2, 2026) +18.3%

vs its benchmark not measured +4.9 pts vs ACWI

Below its high −33.0% −34.2%

Net assets, DRAM as of Oct 28, 2026 and SIL as of Oct 12, 2026 $20.6bn $4.4bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for DRAM.

Alert

About each fund

DRAM

By weight, 16% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 12 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +95.0% with distributions reinvested. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

SIL

By weight, 0% of SIL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 76% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +18.3% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. It sits 34.2% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do DRAM and SIL hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or SIL?: DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SIL has 0%, so SIL differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, DRAM or SIL?: DRAM and SIL both charge 0.65% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

DRAM vs QTUM DRAM vs NLR DRAM vs ARKG DRAM vs XBI SIL vs GRID SIL vs IBB SIL vs SOXX SIL vs SMH

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →DRAM on its own →SIL on its own →DRAM holdings →SIL dividend history →SIL holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

DRAM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

DRAM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Roundhill page for DRAM ↗

SIL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SIL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Global X page for SIL ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DRAM against SIL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/dram-vs-sil

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.