Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

GRID vs SIL: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GRID returned +7.9% to SIL's +18.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GRID and SIL

Net assets: $11.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund, and $4.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Silver Miners ETF.

At a glance
41.1%
GRID in the S&P 500
0.0%
SIL in the S&P 500
+7.9%
GRID total return, 1 year
+18.3%
SIL total return, 1 year
GRID · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 59% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
59% of its weight is outside the S&P 50041% of GRID's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 59% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.41%59%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 92% · top ten 57% of the fund · 122 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 9% in59% of its weight is outside the S&P 50041% of GRID's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 59% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.41%59%in the S&P 500outside the S&P 500active share 92% · Nasdaq-100: 9% in

41% of GRID's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 59% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

SIL · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of SIL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 76% of the fund · 39 holdings as filed for Jul 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of SIL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of SIL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

GRID costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.4 points; GRID is 2.8 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

GRID vs SIL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureGRIDSIL
Return
Total return, 1 year+7.9%+18.3%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high14.7%, high on May 11, 202634.2%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksElectrification and the gridSilver miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+13.3%+13.4%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 5.4 ptsahead by 4.9 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.56%0.65%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$12.1bn$4.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 30, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 860 weekly returns
GRID SIL
Return
Total return edge GRID +516.4% +93.6%
Annualized edge GRID +11.6% +4.1%
Price return edge GRID +412.7% +62.4%
Risk
Volatility edge GRID 22.2% 39.9%
Max drawdown edge GRID −39.0% −82.3%
Downside capture 110.3% 100.9%
Beta 1.15 1.03
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge GRID 0.54 0.26
Sortino edge GRID 0.78 0.38
Treynor 0.104 0.101
Calmar edge GRID 0.30 0.05
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.7% a year +0.6% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.97 0.07
Information ratio −0.06 0.03
Tracking error 11.6% 36.2%

Each against its own benchmark: GRID against IWV, Nov 27, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026; SIL against ACWI, Apr 30, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

GRID returned more: +516.4% to +93.6%. GRID swung less: 22.2% to 39.9%. GRID fell less at its worst: −39.0% to −82.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GRID vs SIL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureGRIDSILEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+516.4%+93.6%GRIDPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+11.6%+4.1%GRIDTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+412.7%+62.4%GRIDPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.2%39.9%GRIDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.2%27.5%GRIDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−39.0%−82.3%GRIDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture115.2%84.6%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture110.3%100.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.151.03Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.740.18Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.540.26GRIDReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.780.38GRIDReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1040.101Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.300.05GRIDAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWVACWIThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.7% a year+0.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.970.07Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−8.1% to +2.8%−16.9% to +18.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.060.03Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error11.6%36.2%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 860 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, GRID and SIL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GRID SIL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GRID
Johnson Controls International Plc 9.28%
Eaton Corporation Plc 8.12%
Quanta Services, Inc. 8.10%
ABB Ltd 7.50%
Schneider Electric SE 6.71%
National Grid Plc 4.35%
E.ON SE 4.25%
Prysmian SpA 3.60%
Only in SIL
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. 22.38%
Pan American Silver Corp. 12.54%
COEUR MINING, INC. 10.59%
INDUSTRIAS PENOLES, S.A.B. DE C.V. 5.21%
HECLA MINING COMPANY 4.63%
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP. 4.47%
FRESNILLO PLC 4.30%
Compania de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. 4.18%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: GRID vs SIL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowGRIDSILGRIDSIL
3 months+1.3%+6.3%−4.2 pts vs IWV+1.9 pts vs ACWI
6 months−7.5%−10.2%−16.3 pts vs IWV−17.6 pts vs ACWI
1 year+7.9%+18.3%−5.4 pts vs IWV+4.9 pts vs ACWI
3 years+104.9%+227.9%+12.1 pts vs IWV+139.0 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: GRID Nov 2009 · SIL Apr 2010+576.0%+109.0%not measured−286.2 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund · Holds 122 stocks in electrification and the grid, 41% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF · Holds 39 stocks in silver miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Electrification and the grid Silver miners
In the S&P 500 41.1% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 92.3% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 8.9% 0.0%
Holdings 122 39
Top ten, share of the fund 57.0% 76.3%
Expense ratio 0.56% 0.65%
Fee for the differing part 0.61% 0.65%
Total return, 1 year +7.9% +18.3%
vs its benchmark −5.4 pts vs IWV +4.9 pts vs ACWI
Below its high −14.7% −34.2%
Net assets, GRID as of Oct 27, 2026 and SIL as of Oct 12, 2026 $11.4bn $4.4bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-0A75D0C32A

GRID and SIL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Theme. GRID covers Electrification and the grid and SIL covers Silver miners.
  2. Concentration. The top ten holdings are 57.0% of GRID and 76.3% of SIL, a gap of 19.3 points.
  3. What each follows. GRID follows Electrification and the grid and SIL follows Silver miners.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

GRID flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GRID

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +7.9% with distributions reinvested against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, so a holder was behind by 5.4 pts.

By weight, 41% of GRID's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 122 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. It sits 14.7% below its all-time high of May 11, 2026.

SIL

By weight, 0% of SIL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 76% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +18.3% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. It sits 34.2% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do GRID and SIL hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, GRID or SIL?
GRID has 41% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SIL has 0%, so SIL differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, GRID or SIL?
GRID charges 0.56% a year and SIL charges 0.65%, so GRID is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GRID against SIL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/grid-vs-sil

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.