Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

BOTZ vs SIL: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOTZ returned −10.2% to SIL's +18.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOTZ and SIL

Net assets on Oct 12, 2026: $3.3bn for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF and $4.4bn for Global X Silver Miners ETF.

At a glance
18.6%
BOTZ in the S&P 500
0.0%
SIL in the S&P 500
−10.2%
BOTZ total return, 1 year
+18.3%
SIL total return, 1 year
BOTZ · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 81% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
81% of its weight is outside the S&P 50019% of BOTZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index. Holdings as of May 31, 2026.19%81%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 88% · top ten 59% of the fund · 61 holdings as filed for May 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 19% in81% of its weight is outside the S&P 50019% of BOTZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index. Holdings as of May 31, 2026.19%81%inoutside the S&P 500active share 88% · Nasdaq-100: 19% in

19% of BOTZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index. Holdings as of May 31, 2026.

SIL · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of SIL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 76% of the fund · 39 holdings as filed for Jul 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of SIL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of SIL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

SIL costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 28.5 points; SIL is 1.3 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

BOTZ vs SIL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureBOTZSIL
Return
Total return, 1 year−10.2%+18.3%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high18.2%, high on May 13, 202634.2%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksRobotics and automationSilver miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+13.4%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearahead by 4.9 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.68%0.65%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$3.3bn$4.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Sep 23, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 526 weekly returns
BOTZ SIL
Return
Total return edge BOTZ +125.3% +87.4%
Annualized edge BOTZ +8.4% +6.4%
Price return edge BOTZ +116.2% +62.1%
Risk
Volatility edge BOTZ 25.6% 39.5%
Max drawdown edge BOTZ (slight) −55.4% −56.7%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge BOTZ 0.34 0.30
Sortino edge BOTZ 0.50 0.43
Calmar edge BOTZ 0.15 0.11
Reading

BOTZ returned more: +125.3% to +87.4%. BOTZ swung less: 25.6% to 39.5%. BOTZ fell slightly less at its worst: −55.4% to −56.7%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BOTZ vs SIL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureBOTZSILEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+125.3%+87.4%BOTZPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+8.4%+6.4%BOTZTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+116.2%+62.1%BOTZPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility25.6%39.5%BOTZSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation17.7%27.3%BOTZLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−55.4%−56.7%BOTZ (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.340.30BOTZReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.500.43BOTZReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.150.11BOTZAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 526 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOTZ and SIL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOTZ SIL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOTZ
KEYENCE CORPORATION 9.30%
ABB Ltd 9.03%
FANUC CORPORATION 8.98%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.28%
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. 6.14%
Shenzhen Inovance Technology Co., Ltd 4.32%
SMC CORPORATION 4.01%
DAIFUKU CO., LTD. 3.52%
Only in SIL
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. 22.38%
Pan American Silver Corp. 12.54%
COEUR MINING, INC. 10.59%
INDUSTRIAS PENOLES, S.A.B. DE C.V. 5.21%
HECLA MINING COMPANY 4.63%
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP. 4.47%
FRESNILLO PLC 4.30%
Compania de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. 4.18%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: BOTZ vs SIL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowBOTZSILBOTZSIL
3 months+1.0%+6.3%not measured+1.9 pts vs ACWI
6 months−8.8%−10.2%not measured−17.6 pts vs ACWI
1 year−10.2%+18.3%not measured+4.9 pts vs ACWI
3 years+53.7%+227.9%not measured+139.0 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: BOTZ Sep 2016 · SIL Apr 2010+140.2%+109.0%not measured−286.2 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF · Holds 61 stocks in robotics and automation, 19% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF · Holds 39 stocks in silver miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Robotics and automation Silver miners
In the S&P 500 18.6% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 88.2% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 18.6% 0.0%
Holdings 61 39
Top ten, share of the fund 58.7% 76.3%
Expense ratio 0.68% 0.65%
Fee for the differing part 0.77% 0.65%
Total return, 1 year −10.2% +18.3%
vs its benchmark not measured +4.9 pts vs ACWI
Below its high −18.2% −34.2%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 $3.3bn $4.4bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-75B018F3AB

BOTZ and SIL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Theme. BOTZ covers Robotics and automation and SIL covers Silver miners.
  2. Concentration. The top ten holdings are 58.7% of BOTZ and 76.3% of SIL, a gap of 17.6 points.
  3. What each follows. BOTZ follows Robotics and automation and SIL follows Silver miners.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOTZ

By weight, 19% of BOTZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 88%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 61 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −10.2% with distributions reinvested. It sits 18.2% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.

SIL

By weight, 0% of SIL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 76% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +18.3% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. It sits 34.2% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do BOTZ and SIL hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BOTZ or SIL?
BOTZ has 19% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SIL has 0%, so SIL differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BOTZ or SIL?
BOTZ charges 0.68% a year and SIL charges 0.65%, so SIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOTZ against SIL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/botz-vs-sil

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.