Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BOTZ vs KWEB: which is really different?

BOTZ holds 21.9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and KWEB 0.0%.

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF, side by side, thematic ETFs on ETFIQ.

21.9%BOTZ in the S&P 500
0.0%KWEB in the S&P 500
+3.6%BOTZ total return, 1 year
−36.0%KWEB total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Off-Index Score: KWEB scores higher

How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

BOTZ 22.5KWEB 91.60.1, the lowest in this set91.6, the highest

A percentile among the 371 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BOTZ78% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
22%78%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 88% · top ten 55% of the fund · 85 holdings filed Sep 11, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 19% in22%78%inoutside the S&P 500active share 88% · top ten 55% of the fund
KWEB100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 61% of the fund · 45 holdings filed Sep 11, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 8% in0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 61% of the fund

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BOTZ and KWEB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BOTZOnly in KWEB
FANUC CORP 7.98%TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD 10.25%
ABB LTD-REG 7.80%ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD 8.61%
KEYENCE CORP 7.75%PDD HOLDINGS INC 8.11%
INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC 7.65%MEITUAN-CLASS B 7.32%
NVIDIA CORP 7.49%NETEASE INC 6.25%
SMC CORP 4.59%LENOVO GROUP LTD 5.56%
DAIFUKU CO LTD 3.30%KE HOLDINGS INC-CL A 4.41%
AURORA INNOVATION INC 2.71%JD.COM INC-CLASS A 3.94%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 11, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BOTZ and KWEB over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
BOTZKWEBBOTZKWEBBOTZKWEB
3 months−4.9%−7.1%−8.2 pts−10.4 pts−4.1 pts−6.3 pts
6 months+1.3%−18.4%−14.7 pts−34.5 pts−19.4 pts−39.1 pts
1 year+3.6%−36.0%−13.9 pts−53.5 pts−19.4 pts−59.0 pts
3 years+38.0%−1.9%−39.9 pts−79.8 pts−57.1 pts−97.0 pts
Since launch+149.0%+20.6%−172.1 pts−438.4 pts−416.4 pts−919.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BOTZ and KWEB on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
Holds 85 stocks in robotics and automation, 22% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Holds 45 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
IssuerGlobal XKraneShares
ThemeRobotics and automationInternet and e-commerce
In the S&P 50021.9%0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 50088.2%100.0%
In the Nasdaq-10019.0%8.1%
Holdings8545
Top ten, share of the fund54.6%61.2%
Expense ratio0.68%0.69%
Fee for the differing part0.77%0.69%
Total return, 1 year+3.6%−36.0%
vs the S&P 500−13.9 pts−53.5 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100−19.4 pts−59.0 pts
Below its high−15.2%−71.5%

BOTZ in plain words

By weight, 22% of BOTZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 88%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 85 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 11, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 13.9 pts. It sits 15.2% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.

KWEB in plain words

By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 11, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned −36.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 53.5 pts. It sits 71.5% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.

Questions people ask

Which is more different from the S&P 500, BOTZ or KWEB?
BOTZ has 22% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWEB has 0%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BOTZ or KWEB?
BOTZ charges 0.68% a year and KWEB charges 0.69%, so BOTZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BOTZ against KWEB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOTZ against KWEB, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/botz-vs-kweb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources