Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

BOTZ vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOTZ returned −10.2% to KWEB's −40.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOTZ and KWEB

Net assets: $3.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF, and $4.3bn on Oct 28, 2026 for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF.

At a glance
18.6%
BOTZ in the S&P 500
0.0%
KWEB in the S&P 500
−10.2%
BOTZ total return, 1 year
−40.6%
KWEB total return, 1 year
BOTZ · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 81% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
81% of its weight is outside the S&P 50019% of BOTZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index. Holdings as of May 31, 2026.19%81%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 88% · top ten 59% of the fund · 61 holdings as filed for May 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 19% in81% of its weight is outside the S&P 50019% of BOTZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index. Holdings as of May 31, 2026.19%81%inoutside the S&P 500active share 88% · Nasdaq-100: 19% in

19% of BOTZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index. Holdings as of May 31, 2026.

KWEB · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 62% of the fund · 45 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 8% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 8% in

0% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.

Pair scorecard

BOTZ costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 30.4 points; KWEB is 1.4 times larger.

BOTZ vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureBOTZKWEB
Return
Total return, 1 year−10.2%−40.6%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high18.2%, high on May 13, 202673.4%, high on Feb 17, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksRobotics and automationInternet and e-commerce
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.68%0.69%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$3.3bn$4.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOTZ and KWEB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOTZ KWEB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOTZ
KEYENCE CORPORATION 9.30%
ABB Ltd 9.03%
FANUC CORPORATION 8.98%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.28%
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. 6.14%
Shenzhen Inovance Technology Co., Ltd 4.32%
SMC CORPORATION 4.01%
DAIFUKU CO., LTD. 3.52%
Only in KWEB
TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD 9.90%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD 8.70%
PDD HOLDINGS INC 8.45%
MEITUAN-CLASS B 7.40%
NETEASE INC 6.54%
KE HOLDINGS INC-CL A 4.97%
LENOVO GROUP LTD 4.59%
JD.COM INC-CLASS A 4.16%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: BOTZ vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total return
WindowBOTZKWEB
3 months+1.0%−17.3%
6 months−8.8%−17.9%
1 year−10.2%−40.6%
3 years+53.7%−3.2%
Since launchNot the same days: BOTZ Sep 2016 · KWEB Aug 2013+140.2%+12.7%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF · Holds 61 stocks in robotics and automation, 19% of its weight in S&P 500 companies KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF · Holds 45 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Robotics and automation Internet and e-commerce
In the S&P 500 18.6% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 88.2% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 18.6% 8.4%
Holdings 61 45
Top ten, share of the fund 58.7% 61.5%
Expense ratio 0.68% 0.69%
Fee for the differing part 0.77% 0.69%
Total return, 1 year −10.2% −40.6%
vs its benchmark not measured not measured
Below its high −18.2% −73.4%
Net assets, BOTZ as of Oct 12, 2026 and KWEB as of Oct 28, 2026 $3.3bn $4.3bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

KWEB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOTZ

By weight, 19% of BOTZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 88%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 61 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −10.2% with distributions reinvested. It sits 18.2% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.

KWEB

By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −40.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 73.4% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do BOTZ and KWEB hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BOTZ or KWEB?
BOTZ has 19% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWEB has 0%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BOTZ or KWEB?
BOTZ charges 0.68% a year and KWEB charges 0.69%, so BOTZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOTZ against KWEB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/botz-vs-kweb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.