Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

KWEB vs QTUM: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, KWEB returned −40.6% to QTUM's +28.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about KWEB and QTUM

Net assets: $4.3bn on Oct 28, 2026 for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF, and $5.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Defiance Quantum ETF.

At a glance
0.0%
KWEB in the S&P 500
37.5%
QTUM in the S&P 500
−40.6%
KWEB total return, 1 year
+28.9%
QTUM total return, 1 year
KWEB · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 62% of the fund · 45 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 8% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 8% in

0% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.

QTUM · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 63% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
63% of its weight is outside the S&P 50038% of QTUM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 63% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.38%63%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 82% · top ten 19% of the fund · 85 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 28% in63% of its weight is outside the S&P 50038% of QTUM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 63% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.38%63%in the S&P 500outside the S&P 500active share 82% · Nasdaq-100: 28% in

38% of QTUM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 63% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.

Pair scorecard

QTUM costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 69.5 points; QTUM is 1.3 times larger.

KWEB vs QTUM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureKWEBQTUM
Return
Total return, 1 year−40.6%+28.9%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high73.4%, high on Feb 17, 202114.3%, high on Jun 2, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksInternet and e-commerceQuantum computing
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.69%0.40%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$4.3bn$5.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund62%18%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 28, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Sep 14, 2018 to Oct 23, 2026 · 423 weekly returns
KWEB QTUM
Return
Total return edge QTUM −40.0% +489.3%
Annualized edge QTUM −6.1% +24.4%
Price return edge QTUM −51.8% +450.1%
Risk
Volatility edge QTUM 39.6% 26.3%
Max drawdown edge QTUM −79.9% −38.1%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QTUM −0.04 0.86
Sortino edge QTUM −0.06 1.28
Calmar edge QTUM −0.08 0.64
Reading

QTUM returned more: +489.3% to −40.0%. QTUM swung less: 26.3% to 39.6%. QTUM fell less at its worst: −38.1% to −79.9%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: KWEB vs QTUM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureKWEBQTUMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return−40.0%+489.3%QTUMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized−6.1%+24.4%QTUMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−51.8%+450.1%QTUMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility39.6%26.3%QTUMSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation26.0%17.6%QTUMLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−79.9%−38.1%QTUMDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.040.86QTUMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.061.28QTUMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar−0.080.64QTUMAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 423 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, KWEB and QTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 28, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first KWEB QTUM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in KWEB
TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD 9.90%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD 8.70%
PDD HOLDINGS INC 8.45%
MEITUAN-CLASS B 7.40%
NETEASE INC 6.54%
KE HOLDINGS INC-CL A 4.97%
LENOVO GROUP LTD 4.59%
JD.COM INC-CLASS A 4.16%
Only in QTUM
Global Unichip Corp 2.43%
Elastic Nv 2.14%
Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd 1.86%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.84%
Nutanix Inc 1.78%
Cloudflare Inc 1.77%
Snowflake Inc 1.73%
Arqit Quantum Inc 1.72%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: KWEB vs QTUM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total return
WindowKWEBQTUM
3 months−17.3%+9.1%
6 months−17.9%+11.2%
1 year−40.6%+28.9%
3 years−3.2%+229.7%
Since launchNot the same days: KWEB Aug 2013 · QTUM Sep 2018+12.7%+522.8%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF · Holds 45 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF · Holds 85 stocks in quantum computing, 38% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Internet and e-commerce Quantum computing
In the S&P 500 0.0% 37.5%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 82.2%
In the Nasdaq-100 8.4% 28.0%
Holdings 45 85
Top ten, share of the fund 61.5% 18.5%
Expense ratio 0.69% 0.40%
Fee for the differing part 0.69% 0.49%
Total return, 1 year −40.6% +28.9%
vs its benchmark not measured not measured
Below its high −73.4% −14.3%
Net assets, KWEB as of Oct 28, 2026 and QTUM as of Oct 27, 2026 $4.3bn $5.4bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-B5B7A4A56E

KWEB and QTUM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Theme. KWEB covers Internet and e-commerce and QTUM covers Quantum computing.
  2. Concentration. The top ten holdings are 61.5% of KWEB and 18.5% of QTUM, a gap of 43.0 points.
  3. What each follows. KWEB follows Internet and e-commerce and QTUM follows Quantum computing.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

KWEB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
KWEB

By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −40.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 73.4% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.

QTUM

By weight, 38% of QTUM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 82%. The top ten holdings are 18% of the fund across 85 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +28.9% with distributions reinvested. It sits 14.3% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do KWEB and QTUM hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, KWEB or QTUM?
KWEB has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and QTUM has 38%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, KWEB or QTUM?
KWEB charges 0.69% a year and QTUM charges 0.40%, so QTUM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, KWEB against QTUM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/kweb-vs-qtum

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.