GRID vs IBB: which is really different?
GRID and IBB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IBB returned +36.1% over the year. First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund and iShares Biotechnology ETF.
IBB costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.6 points; GRID is 1.2 times larger.
| GRID | IBB | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.56% | 0.44% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $12.0bn | $10.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.5% | +36.1% |
| What it tracks | Electrification and the grid | Biotech |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| S&P 500, total return, 1 year | +17.3% | |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | ahead by 2.3 pts | ahead by 18.8 pts |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 92% | |
| Below its all-time high | 8.9%, high on May 11, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
41% of GRID's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 60% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.
40% of IBB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 61% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.
A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GRID and IBB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
half
0% in common
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | GRID | IBB | GRID | IBB | GRID | IBB |
| 3 months | −1.9% | +7.5% | −5.3 pts | +4.1 pts | −5.6 pts | +3.9 pts |
| 6 months | +2.3% | +21.9% | −12.9 pts | +6.8 pts | −20.9 pts | −1.3 pts |
| 1 year | +19.5% | +36.1% | +2.3 pts | +18.8 pts | −4.0 pts | +12.5 pts |
| 3 years | +98.8% | +69.1% | +13.1 pts | −16.7 pts | −8.4 pts | −38.2 pts |
| Since launch GRID Nov 2009 · IBB Feb 2001 | +621.8% | +525.3% | −223.3 pts | −299.7 pts | −1,223.8 pts | −936.3 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GRID in plain words
By weight, 40% of GRID's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 123 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +19.5% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 2.3 pts. It sits 8.9% below its all-time high of May 11, 2026.
IBB in plain words
By weight, 40% of IBB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 245 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +36.1% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 18.8 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do GRID and IBB hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, GRID against IBB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/grid-vs-ibb
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). GRID against IBB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/grid-vs-ibb
[GRID against IBB (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/grid-vs-ibb)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.