Do DRAM and KWEB hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or KWEB?

DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWEB has 0%, so KWEB differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, DRAM or KWEB?

DRAM charges 0.65% a year and KWEB charges 0.69%, so DRAM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

DRAM vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

DRAM and KWEB hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DRAM and KWEB

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $20.6bn for Roundhill Memory ETF and $4.3bn for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF.

DRAM on its own →KWEB on its own →

At a glance

15.7%

DRAM in the S&P 500

0.0%

KWEB in the S&P 500

+95.0%

DRAM total return, since launch, Apr 2, 2026

−40.6%

KWEB total return, 1 year

DRAM · 6 months to Oct 28, 2026 84% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of DRAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

KWEB · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.

Pair scorecard

DRAM costs 0.04 points a year less; DRAM is 4.8 times larger.

DRAM vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	DRAM	KWEB
Return
Measure	DRAM	KWEB
Total return, 1 year	not published	−40.6%
Drawdown
Measure	DRAM	KWEB
Below its all-time high	33.0%, high on Jun 22, 2026	73.4%, high on Feb 17, 2021
Benchmark
Measure	DRAM	KWEB
What it tracks	Memory and storage	Internet and e-commerce
Cost and size
Measure	DRAM	KWEB
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.69%
Net assets	$20.6bn	$4.3bn
Holdings
Measure	DRAM	KWEB
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026. Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, DRAM and KWEB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DRAM KWEB

Only in one fund ↓

Only in DRAM

SK hynix Inc 15.89%

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 14.37%

Sandisk Corp 5.21%

Kioxia Holdings Corp 4.36%

Western Digital Corp 4.30%

Seagate Technology Holdings PL 4.19%

GigaDevice Semiconductor Inc 3.07%

Micron Technology Inc 2.03%

Only in KWEB

TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD 9.90%

ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD 8.70%

PDD HOLDINGS INC 8.45%

MEITUAN-CLASS B 7.40%

NETEASE INC 6.54%

KE HOLDINGS INC-CL A 4.97%

LENOVO GROUP LTD 4.59%

JD.COM INC-CLASS A 4.16%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: DRAM vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return
Window	DRAM	KWEB
3 months	+20.7%	−17.3%
6 months	+41.6%	−17.9%
1 year	–	−40.6%
3 years	–	−3.2%
Since launchNot the same days: DRAM Apr 2026 · KWEB Aug 2013	+95.0%	+12.7%

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF · Holds 12 stocks in memory and storage, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF · Holds 45 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Roundhill KraneShares

Theme Memory and storage Internet and e-commerce

In the S&P 500 15.7% 0.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 96.8% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 15.7% 8.4%

Holdings 12 45

Top ten, share of the fund 56.4% 61.5%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.69%

Fee for the differing part 0.67% 0.69%

Total return, 1 year +95.0% (since launch, Apr 2, 2026) −40.6%

vs its benchmark not measured not measured

Below its high −33.0% −73.4%

Net assets $20.6bn $4.3bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

DRAM

By weight, 16% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 12 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +95.0% with distributions reinvested. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

KWEB

By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −40.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 73.4% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do DRAM and KWEB hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or KWEB?: DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWEB has 0%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, DRAM or KWEB?: DRAM charges 0.65% a year and KWEB charges 0.69%, so DRAM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

DRAM vs FDN DRAM vs SIL DRAM vs XT DRAM vs ARTY KWEB vs FDNI KWEB vs FMQQ KWEB vs ISHP KWEB vs GDX

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →DRAM on its own →KWEB on its own →DRAM holdings →KWEB dividend history →KWEB holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

DRAM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

DRAM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Roundhill page for DRAM ↗

KWEB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

KWEB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

KraneShares page for KWEB ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DRAM against KWEB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/dram-vs-kweb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.