Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

FMQQ vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FMQQ returned −18.5% to KWEB's −34.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FMQQ and KWEB

Net assets: $22m on Aug 31, 2026 for FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet ETF, and $4.4bn on Nov 4, 2026 for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF.

At a glance
0.0%
FMQQ in the S&P 500
0.0%
KWEB in the S&P 500
−18.5%
FMQQ total return, 1 year
−34.0%
KWEB total return, 1 year
FMQQ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of FMQQ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 59% of the fund · 37 holdings as filed for Aug 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 8% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of FMQQ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 8% in

0% of FMQQ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.

KWEB · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 61% of the fund · 45 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 9% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 9% in

0% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

KWEB costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.5 points.

FMQQ vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureFMQQKWEB
Return
Total return, 1 year−18.5%−34.0%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high53.3%, high on Oct 19, 202171.8%, high on Feb 17, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksInternet and e-commerceInternet and e-commerce
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.86%0.69%
Net assets, FMQQ as of Aug 31, 2026 and KWEB as of Nov 4, 2026$22m$4.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FMQQ and KWEB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FMQQ KWEB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FMQQ
SEA LIMITED 7.94%
MercadoLibre, Inc. 7.74%
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED 6.98%
Nu Holdings Ltd. 6.51%
BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED 6.30%
Eternal Limited 5.32%
Allegro.eu SA 5.05%
Joint Stock Company Kaspi.kz 4.73%
Only in KWEB
TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD 9.92%
PDD HOLDINGS INC 8.67%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD 8.55%
MEITUAN-CLASS B 7.56%
NETEASE INC 6.57%
KE HOLDINGS INC-CL A 4.92%
JD.COM INC-CLASS A 4.28%
LENOVO GROUP LTD 3.89%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: FMQQ vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total return
WindowFMQQKWEB
3 months−6.7%−14.8%
6 months−2.2%−18.3%
1 year−18.5%−34.0%
3 years+16.6%−0.8%
Since launchNot the same days: FMQQ Sep 2021 · KWEB Aug 2013−51.7%+19.2%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

FMQQ FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet ETF · Holds 37 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF · Holds 45 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Internet and e-commerce Internet and e-commerce
In the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 7.6% 8.7%
Holdings 37 45
Top ten, share of the fund 58.7% 61.4%
Expense ratio 0.86% 0.69%
Fee for the differing part 0.86% 0.69%
Total return, 1 year −18.5% −34.0%
vs its benchmark not measured not measured
Below its high −53.3% −71.8%
Net assets, FMQQ as of Aug 31, 2026 and KWEB as of Nov 4, 2026 $22m $4.4bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

KWEB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FMQQ

By weight, 0% of FMQQ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 37 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −18.5% with distributions reinvested. It sits 53.3% below its all-time high of Oct 19, 2021.

KWEB

By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −34.0% with distributions reinvested. It sits 71.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do FMQQ and KWEB hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, FMQQ or KWEB?
FMQQ has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWEB has 0%, so FMQQ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, FMQQ or KWEB?
FMQQ charges 0.86% a year and KWEB charges 0.69%, so KWEB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FMQQ against KWEB, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fmqq-vs-kweb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.