Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
KWEB vs SOCL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, KWEB returned −34.0% to SOCL's −26.3%; 17% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about KWEB and SOCL
Net assets: $4.4bn on Nov 4, 2026 for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF, and $87m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Social Media ETF.
0% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
14% of SOCL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 86% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
Pair scorecard
SOCL costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.7 points; KWEB is far larger, $4.5bn against $87m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | KWEB | SOCL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −34.0% | −26.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 71.8%, high on Feb 17, 2021 | 45.7%, high on Feb 16, 2021 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Internet and e-commerce | Internet and e-commerce |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.0% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 41.3 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.65% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $4.5bn | $87m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 17% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, KWEB and SOCL hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
17% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | KWEB | SOCL | KWEB | SOCL |
| 3 months | −14.8% | −11.1% | not measured | −9.8 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | −18.3% | −12.0% | not measured | −14.6 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | −34.0% | −26.3% | not measured | −41.3 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | −0.8% | +14.5% | not measured | −63.1 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: KWEB Aug 2013 · SOCL Nov 2011 | +19.2% | +192.3% | not measured | −203.2 pts vs ACWI |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
17% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
KWEB
By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −34.0% with distributions reinvested. It sits 71.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.
SOCL
By weight, 14% of SOCL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 69% of the fund across 48 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −26.3% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 41.3 pts. It sits 45.7% below its all-time high of Feb 16, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do KWEB and SOCL hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, KWEB against SOCL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/kweb-vs-socl
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). KWEB against SOCL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/kweb-vs-socl
[KWEB against SOCL (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/kweb-vs-socl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.