Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

KWEB vs SOCL: which is really different?

KWEB and SOCL hold 22% of their weight in the same names, and SOCL returned more over the year.

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF and Global X Social Media ETF.

0.0%KWEB in the S&P 500
16.4%SOCL in the S&P 500
−37.3%KWEB total return, 1 year
−30.4%SOCL total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Off-Index Score: KWEB scores higher

How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

KWEB 91.8SOCL 31.30.1, the lowest in this set91.8, the highest

A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

KWEB100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 62% of the fund · 46 holdings filed Sep 18, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 8% in0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 62% of the fund
SOCL84% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
16%84%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 95% · top ten 69% of the fund · 50 holdings filed Sep 18, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 16% in16%84%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 95% · top ten 69% of the fund

22% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, KWEB and SOCL hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions KWEB and SOCL both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingKWEBSOCL
TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD9.96%8.95%
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY2.99%5.20%
TENCENT MUSIC ENTERTAINM-ADR2.04%2.05%
JOYY INC-ADR0.98%1.03%
MEITU INC0.70%0.85%
EAST BUY HOLDING0.67%0.68%
WEIBO CORP-SPON ADR0.26%0.26%
Cash0.23%0.09%
Only in each
Only in KWEBOnly in SOCL
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD 8.70%META PLATFORMS INC 10.89%
PDD HOLDINGS INC 8.17%NAVER CORP 9.58%
MEITUAN-CLASS B 7.09%REDDIT INC-CL A 9.51%
LENOVO GROUP LTD 6.63%ALPHABET INC-CL A 5.47%
NETEASE INC 6.26%NETEASE INC-ADR 5.17%
KE HOLDINGS INC-CL A 4.23%SPOTIFY TECHNOLOGY SA 5.04%
JD.COM INC-CLASS A 3.87%PINTEREST INC- CLASS A 4.81%
TRIP.COM GROUP LTD 3.57%MATCH GROUP INC 4.67%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

KWEB and SOCL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
KWEBSOCLKWEBSOCLKWEBSOCL
3 months−1.6%−3.6%−3.9 pts−5.8 pts+0.9 pts−1.1 pts
6 months−12.0%−1.7%−30.1 pts−19.7 pts−36.3 pts−25.9 pts
1 year−37.3%−30.4%−53.8 pts−46.9 pts−59.0 pts−52.1 pts
3 years+0.7%+18.2%−77.7 pts−60.2 pts−97.5 pts−80.0 pts
Since launch+21.7%+204.7%−436.7 pts−480.5 pts−928.1 pts−1106.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
KWEB and SOCL on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Holds 46 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
Holds 50 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
IssuerKraneSharesGlobal X
ThemeInternet and e-commerceInternet and e-commerce
In the S&P 5000.0%16.4%
Active share vs the S&P 500100.0%94.8%
In the Nasdaq-1008.2%16.4%
Holdings4650
Top ten, share of the fund61.7%69.3%
Expense ratio0.69%0.65%
Fee for the differing part0.69%0.69%
Total return, 1 year−37.3%−30.4%
vs the S&P 500−53.8 pts−46.9 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100−59.0 pts−52.1 pts
Below its high−71.2%−43.4%
Net assets$4.7bn$89m

KWEB in plain words

By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 46 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned −37.3% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 53.8 pts. It sits 71.2% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.

SOCL in plain words

By weight, 16% of SOCL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 69% of the fund across 50 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned −30.4% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 46.9 pts. It sits 43.4% below its all-time high of Feb 16, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do KWEB and SOCL hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 22% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, KWEB or SOCL?
KWEB has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SOCL has 16%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, KWEB or SOCL?
KWEB charges 0.69% a year and SOCL charges 0.65%, so SOCL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

KWEB against SOCL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, KWEB against SOCL, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/kweb-vs-socl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources