Do CBOT and RTOO hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, CBOT or RTOO?

CBOT has 50% of its weight in S&P 500 names and RTOO has 6%, so RTOO differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, CBOT or RTOO?

CBOT charges 0.35% a year and RTOO charges 0.75%, so CBOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

CBOT vs RTOO: which is really different?

CBOT and RTOO hold 8% of their weight in the same names. Corgi Robots & Humanoids ETF and VistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETF.

50.5%

CBOT in the S&P 500

6.1%

RTOO in the S&P 500

−11.1%

CBOT total return, since launch

−4.4%

RTOO total return, since launch

CBOT · 3 months to Sep 30, 202650% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

51% of CBOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 50% is outside the index

RTOO · since launch to Sep 30, 202694% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

6% of RTOO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 94% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · RTOO scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

CBOT 13.7

RTOO 60.1

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CBOT and RTOO hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 1, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

50%

half

8% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding CBOT RTOO

Novanta Inc 4.56% 3.09%

Cognex Corp 5.27% 2.03%

Symbotic Inc 2.98% 1.30%

NVIDIA Corp 14.45% 0.85%

Ambarella Inc 4.10% 0.79%

Only in CBOT

Alphabet Inc 11.03%

UiPath Inc 5.39%

Aurora Innovation Inc 5.18%

Amazon.com Inc 4.83%

Tesla Inc 4.79%

Intuitive Surgical Inc 4.46%

Caterpillar Inc 4.10%

JBT Marel Corp 3.74%

Only in RTOO

Yaskawa Electric Corp 4.28%

Nabtesco Corp 3.70%

Keyence Corp 3.64%

Harmonic Drive Systems Inc 3.55%

AutoStore Holdings Ltd 3.43%

Robotis Co Ltd 3.27%

FANUC Corp 2.91%

Rockwell Automation Inc 2.91%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

8% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	CBOT	RTOO	CBOT	RTOO	CBOT	RTOO
3 months	−8.3%	not published	−10.8 pts	not published	−10.4 pts	not published
Since launch CBOT May 2026 · RTOO Jul 2026	−11.1%	−4.4%	−15.6 pts	−6.2 pts	−17.7 pts	−9.3 pts

CBOT and RTOO over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

CBOT

Corgi Robots & Humanoids ETF · Holds 25 stocks in humanoid robots, 50% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

RTOO

VistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETF · Holds 60 stocks in robotics and automation, 6% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Corgi VistaShares

Theme Humanoid robots Robotics and automation

In the S&P 500 50.5% 6.1%

Active share vs the S&P 500 82.3% 98.9%

In the Nasdaq-100 39.6% 0.9%

Holdings 25 60

Top ten, share of the fund 64.1% 33.5%

Expense ratio 0.35% 0.75%

Fee for the differing part 0.43% 0.76%

Total return, 1 year −11.1% (since launch on May 6, 2026) −4.4% (since launch on Jul 16, 2026)

vs the S&P 500 −15.6 pts −6.2 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −17.7 pts −9.3 pts

Below its high −14.2% −10.6%

Net assets $2m $4m

CBOT and RTOO on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CBOT in plain words

By weight, 50% of CBOT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 82%. The top ten holdings are 64% of the fund across 25 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Since it launched on May 6, 2026 the fund returned −11.1% with distributions reinvested against +4.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 15.6 pts. It sits 14.2% below its all-time high of May 28, 2026.

RTOO in plain words

By weight, 6% of RTOO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 34% of the fund across 60 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Since it launched on Jul 16, 2026 the fund returned −4.4% with distributions reinvested against +1.8% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 6.2 pts. It sits 10.6% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do CBOT and RTOO hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, CBOT or RTOO?: CBOT has 50% of its weight in S&P 500 names and RTOO has 6%, so RTOO differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CBOT or RTOO?: CBOT charges 0.35% a year and RTOO charges 0.75%, so CBOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CBOT vs ROBO CBOT vs FBOT CBOT vs HUMN CBOT vs IBOT RTOO vs ARKQ RTOO vs DRNZ RTOO vs FBOT RTOO vs HUMN

CBOT on its own →RTOO on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

CBOT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CBOT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Corgi website ↗RTOO filings on SEC EDGAR ↗RTOO prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VistaShares page for RTOO ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CBOT against RTOO, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cbot-vs-rtoo

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.