Do IBOT and RTOO hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 28% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, IBOT or RTOO?

IBOT has 31% of its weight in S&P 500 names and RTOO has 6%, so RTOO differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, IBOT or RTOO?

IBOT charges 0.47% a year and RTOO charges 0.75%, so IBOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

IBOT vs RTOO: which is really different?

IBOT and RTOO hold 28% of their weight in the same names. VanEck Robotics ETF and VistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETF.

30.8%

IBOT in the S&P 500

6.1%

RTOO in the S&P 500

+29.8%

IBOT total return, 1 year

−4.4%

RTOO total return, since launch

IBOT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202669% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

31% of IBOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 69% is outside the index

RTOO · since launch to Sep 30, 202694% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

6% of RTOO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 94% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · RTOO scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

IBOT 24.4

RTOO 60.1

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IBOT and RTOO hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 1, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

50%

half

28% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding IBOT RTOO

Keyence Corp 5.66% 3.64%

Rockwell Automation Inc 3.62% 2.91%

Fanuc Corp 2.60% 2.91%

Omron Corp 1.84% 2.56%

Autostore Holdings Ltd 1.77% 3.43%

Daifuku Co Ltd 1.72% 1.69%

Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc 2.02% 1.66%

Renishaw Plc 1.58% 2.54%

Novanta Inc 1.38% 3.09%

Kardex Holding Ag 1.34% 1.31%

Symbotic Inc 1.39% 1.30%

Yaskawa Electric Corp 1.29% 4.28%

Only in IBOT

Emerson Electric Co 5.61%

Asml Holding Nv 5.16%

Abb Ltd 4.70%

Autodesk Inc 3.61%

Teledyne Technologies Inc 2.29%

Technipfmc Plc 2.29%

Hexagon Ab 2.03%

Konecranes Oyj 1.91%

Only in RTOO

Nabtesco Corp 3.70%

Harmonic Drive Systems Inc 3.55%

Robotis Co Ltd 3.27%

SMC Corp 2.69%

THK Co Ltd 2.54%

Siemens AG 2.48%

Schaeffler AG 2.35%

NIDEC CORP 2.26%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

28% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	IBOT	RTOO	IBOT	RTOO	IBOT	RTOO
3 months	−4.5%	not published	−7.0 pts	not published	−6.6 pts	not published
6 months	+18.6%	not published	+1.6 pts	not published	−8.3 pts	not published
1 year	+29.8%	not published	+14.1 pts	not published	+6.0 pts	not published
3 years	+93.2%	not published	+8.2 pts	not published	−16.8 pts	not published
Since launch IBOT Apr 2023 · RTOO Jul 2026	+99.5%	−4.4%	+4.8 pts	−6.2 pts	−37.7 pts	−9.3 pts

IBOT and RTOO over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

IBOT

VanEck Robotics ETF · Holds 65 stocks in robotics and automation, 31% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

RTOO

VistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETF · Holds 60 stocks in robotics and automation, 6% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer VanEck VistaShares

Theme Robotics and automation Robotics and automation

In the S&P 500 30.8% 6.1%

Active share vs the S&P 500 90.5% 98.9%

In the Nasdaq-100 17.0% 0.9%

Holdings 65 60

Top ten, share of the fund 41.2% 33.5%

Expense ratio 0.47% 0.75%

Fee for the differing part 0.52% 0.76%

Total return, 1 year +29.8% −4.4% (since launch on Jul 16, 2026)

vs the S&P 500 +14.1 pts −6.2 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 +6.0 pts −9.3 pts

Below its high −6.5% −10.6%

Net assets $103m $4m

IBOT and RTOO on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IBOT in plain words

By weight, 31% of IBOT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 90%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 65 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +29.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 14.1 pts. It sits 6.5% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

RTOO in plain words

By weight, 6% of RTOO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 34% of the fund across 60 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Since it launched on Jul 16, 2026 the fund returned −4.4% with distributions reinvested against +1.8% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 6.2 pts. It sits 10.6% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do IBOT and RTOO hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 28% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, IBOT or RTOO?: IBOT has 31% of its weight in S&P 500 names and RTOO has 6%, so RTOO differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, IBOT or RTOO?: IBOT charges 0.47% a year and RTOO charges 0.75%, so IBOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

IBOT vs JEDI IBOT vs ROBO IBOT vs ARKQ IBOT vs BOTT RTOO vs BOTT RTOO vs BOTZ RTOO vs CBOT RTOO vs DRNZ

IBOT on its own →RTOO on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

IBOT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IBOT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VanEck website ↗RTOO filings on SEC EDGAR ↗RTOO prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VistaShares page for RTOO ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, IBOT against RTOO, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ibot-vs-rtoo

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.