Do DRNZ and RTOO hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRNZ or RTOO?

DRNZ has 15% of its weight in S&P 500 names and RTOO has 6%, so RTOO differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, DRNZ or RTOO?

DRNZ charges 0.65% a year and RTOO charges 0.75%, so DRNZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

DRNZ vs RTOO: which is really different?

DRNZ and RTOO hold 0% of their weight in the same names. REX Drone ETF and VistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETF.

15.4%

DRNZ in the S&P 500

6.1%

RTOO in the S&P 500

−18.7%

DRNZ total return, since launch

−4.4%

RTOO total return, since launch

DRNZ · 6 months to Sep 30, 202685% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

15% of DRNZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 85% is outside the index

RTOO · since launch to Sep 30, 202694% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

6% of RTOO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 94% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · RTOO scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

DRNZ 42.3

RTOO 60.1

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DRNZ and RTOO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 1, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding DRNZ RTOO

Only in DRNZ

AeroVironment Inc 13.14%

Ondas Inc 12.61%

Next Vision Stabilized Systems 11.62%

Unusual Machines Inc /US 5.88%

Elsight Ltd 5.26%

DroneShield Ltd 5.17%

Red Cat Holdings Inc 5.00%

General Electric Co 3.21%

Only in RTOO

Yaskawa Electric Corp 4.28%

Nabtesco Corp 3.70%

Keyence Corp 3.64%

Harmonic Drive Systems Inc 3.55%

AutoStore Holdings Ltd 3.43%

Robotis Co Ltd 3.27%

Novanta Inc 3.09%

FANUC Corp 2.91%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	DRNZ	RTOO	DRNZ	RTOO	DRNZ	RTOO
3 months	−12.3%	not published	−14.8 pts	not published	−14.4 pts	not published
6 months	−18.8%	not published	−35.8 pts	not published	−45.7 pts	not published
Since launch DRNZ Oct 2025 · RTOO Jul 2026	−18.7%	−4.4%	−30.8 pts	−6.2 pts	−35.6 pts	−9.3 pts

DRNZ and RTOO over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

DRNZ

REX Drone ETF · Holds 45 stocks in robotics and automation, 15% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

RTOO

VistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETF · Holds 60 stocks in robotics and automation, 6% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer REX VistaShares

Theme Robotics and automation Robotics and automation

In the S&P 500 15.4% 6.1%

Active share vs the S&P 500 97.3% 98.9%

In the Nasdaq-100 3.5% 0.9%

Holdings 45 60

Top ten, share of the fund 67.8% 33.5%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.75%

Fee for the differing part 0.67% 0.76%

Total return, 1 year −18.7% (since launch on Oct 29, 2025) −4.4% (since launch on Jul 16, 2026)

vs the S&P 500 −30.8 pts −6.2 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −35.6 pts −9.3 pts

Below its high −32.3% −10.6%

Net assets $117m $4m

DRNZ and RTOO on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

DRNZ in plain words

By weight, 15% of DRNZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 68% of the fund across 45 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it launched on Oct 29, 2025 the fund returned −18.7% with distributions reinvested against +12.1% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 30.8 pts. It sits 32.3% below its all-time high of May 29, 2026.

RTOO in plain words

By weight, 6% of RTOO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 34% of the fund across 60 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Since it launched on Jul 16, 2026 the fund returned −4.4% with distributions reinvested against +1.8% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 6.2 pts. It sits 10.6% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do DRNZ and RTOO hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRNZ or RTOO?: DRNZ has 15% of its weight in S&P 500 names and RTOO has 6%, so RTOO differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, DRNZ or RTOO?: DRNZ charges 0.65% a year and RTOO charges 0.75%, so DRNZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

DRNZ vs ROBO DRNZ vs HUMN DRNZ vs IBOT DRNZ vs JEDI RTOO vs ARKQ RTOO vs BOTT RTOO vs FBOT RTOO vs HUMN

DRNZ on its own →RTOO on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

DRNZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗DRNZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗REX page for DRNZ ↗RTOO filings on SEC EDGAR ↗RTOO prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VistaShares page for RTOO ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, DRNZ against RTOO, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/drnz-vs-rtoo

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.