Do FBOT and RTOO hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 30% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, FBOT or RTOO?

FBOT has 44% of its weight in S&P 500 names and RTOO has 6%, so RTOO differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, FBOT or RTOO?

FBOT charges 0.50% a year and RTOO charges 0.75%, so FBOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

FBOT vs RTOO: which is really different?

FBOT and RTOO hold 30% of their weight in the same names. Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF and VistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETF.

44.5%

FBOT in the S&P 500

6.1%

RTOO in the S&P 500

+18.8%

FBOT total return, 1 year

−4.4%

RTOO total return, since launch

FBOT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202656% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

45% of FBOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 56% is outside the index

RTOO · since launch to Sep 30, 202694% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

6% of RTOO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 94% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · RTOO scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

FBOT 18.9

RTOO 60.1

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBOT and RTOO hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 1, 2026.

50%

half

30% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding FBOT RTOO

KEYENCE CORP 2.67% 3.64%

THK CO LTD 3.60% 2.54%

SIEMENS AG 3.19% 2.48%

SMC CORP 2.36% 2.69%

TERADYNE INC 5.94% 2.34%

RENISHAW PLC 2.16% 2.54%

HIWIN TECHNOLOGIES CORP 1.84% 2.01%

ROCKWELL AUTOMATION INC 1.82% 2.91%

SHENZHEN INOVANCE TECHNOLOGY CO LTD 2.12% 1.81%

DAIFUKU CO LTD 3.39% 1.69%

KARDEX HOLDING AG 1.38% 1.31%

AIRTAC INTERNATIONAL GROUP 2.56% 1.26%

Only in FBOT

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 6.72%

DEERE and CO 4.32%

AXON ENTERPRISE INC 3.44%

PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC 3.17%

ALPHABET INC 3.16%

EMERSON ELECTRIC CO 2.40%

MISUMI GROUP INC 2.26%

AMAZON.COM INC 2.23%

Only in RTOO

Yaskawa Electric Corp 4.28%

Nabtesco Corp 3.70%

Harmonic Drive Systems Inc 3.55%

AutoStore Holdings Ltd 3.43%

Robotis Co Ltd 3.27%

Novanta Inc 3.09%

FANUC Corp 2.91%

Omron Corp 2.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

30% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	FBOT	RTOO	FBOT	RTOO	FBOT	RTOO
3 months	−1.8%	not published	−4.3 pts	not published	−3.9 pts	not published
6 months	+14.9%	not published	−2.0 pts	not published	−11.9 pts	not published
1 year	+18.8%	not published	+3.1 pts	not published	−5.0 pts	not published
3 years	+77.2%	not published	−7.7 pts	not published	−32.7 pts	not published
Since launch FBOT Jun 2023 · RTOO Jul 2026	+54.6%	−4.4%	−29.1 pts	−6.2 pts	−54.7 pts	−9.3 pts

FBOT and RTOO over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

FBOT

Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF · Holds 49 stocks in robotics and automation, 44% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

RTOO

VistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETF · Holds 60 stocks in robotics and automation, 6% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Fidelity VistaShares

Theme Robotics and automation Robotics and automation

In the S&P 500 44.5% 6.1%

Active share vs the S&P 500 85.1% 98.9%

In the Nasdaq-100 22.7% 0.9%

Holdings 49 60

Top ten, share of the fund 41.6% 33.5%

Expense ratio 0.50% 0.75%

Fee for the differing part 0.59% 0.76%

Total return, 1 year +18.8% −4.4% (since launch on Jul 16, 2026)

vs the S&P 500 +3.1 pts −6.2 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −5.0 pts −9.3 pts

Below its high −4.8% −10.6%

Net assets $218m $4m

FBOT and RTOO on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

FBOT in plain words

By weight, 44% of FBOT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 85%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 49 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +18.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 3.1 pts.

RTOO in plain words

By weight, 6% of RTOO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 34% of the fund across 60 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Since it launched on Jul 16, 2026 the fund returned −4.4% with distributions reinvested against +1.8% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 6.2 pts. It sits 10.6% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do FBOT and RTOO hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 30% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, FBOT or RTOO?: FBOT has 44% of its weight in S&P 500 names and RTOO has 6%, so RTOO differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, FBOT or RTOO?: FBOT charges 0.50% a year and RTOO charges 0.75%, so FBOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

FBOT vs ROBO FBOT vs HUMN FBOT vs IBOT FBOT vs JEDI RTOO vs ARKQ RTOO vs BOTT RTOO vs BOTZ RTOO vs CBOT

FBOT on its own →RTOO on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

FBOT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗FBOT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Fidelity website ↗RTOO filings on SEC EDGAR ↗RTOO prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VistaShares page for RTOO ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, FBOT against RTOO, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fbot-vs-rtoo

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.