FBOT vs ROBO: which is really different?

FBOT and ROBO hold 31% of their weight in the same names, and ROBO returned +23.2% over the year. Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF and ROBO Global(R) Robotics and Automation Index ETF.

44.5%
FBOT in the S&P 500
22.6%
ROBO in the S&P 500
+18.8%
FBOT total return, 1 year
+23.2%
ROBO total return, 1 year
FBOT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202656% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
56% of its weight is outside the S&P 50045% of FBOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 56% is outside the index45%56%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 85% · top ten 42% of the fund · 49 holdings filed May 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 23% in56% of its weight is outside the S&P 50045% of FBOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 56% is outside the index45%56%in the S&P 500outside the S&P 500active share 85% · top ten 42% of the fund

45% of FBOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 56% is outside the index

ROBO · 1 year to Sep 30, 202677% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
77% of its weight is outside the S&P 50023% of ROBO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 77% is outside the index23%77%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 96% · top ten 18% of the fund · 79 holdings filed Jul 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 8% in77% of its weight is outside the S&P 50023% of ROBO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 77% is outside the index23%77%inoutside the S&P 500active share 96% · top ten 18% of the fund

23% of ROBO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 77% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · ROBO scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBOT and ROBO hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

half

31% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FBOT ROBO
AIRTAC INTERNATIONAL GROUP 2.56% 1.94%
TERADYNE INC 5.94% 1.84%
FANUC CORPORATION 2.03% 1.78%
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION INC 1.82% 1.71%
DAIFUKU CO LTD 3.39% 1.59%
RENISHAW PLC 2.16% 1.49%
ATS CORP 1.80% 1.46%
KARDEX HOLDING AG 1.38% 1.52%
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO 2.40% 1.36%
THK CO LTD 3.60% 1.34%
NVIDIA CORP 4.66% 1.32%
DEERE and CO 4.32% 1.20%
Only in FBOT
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 6.72%
AXON ENTERPRISE INC 3.44%
SIEMENS AG 3.19%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC 3.17%
ALPHABET INC 3.16%
KEYENCE CORP 2.67%
SMC CORP 2.36%
MISUMI GROUP INC 2.26%
Only in ROBO
CELESTICA INC. 2.22%
Koh Young Technology Inc 1.85%
Infineon Technologies AG 1.84%
HIWIN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 1.83%
Harmonic Drive Systems Inc. 1.79%
AMBARELLA, INC. 1.78%
DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.77%
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 1.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

31% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowFBOTROBOFBOTROBOFBOTROBO
3 months−1.8%−5.8%−4.3 pts−8.3 pts−3.9 pts−7.9 pts
6 months+14.9%+14.7%−2.0 pts−2.3 pts−11.9 pts−12.2 pts
1 year+18.8%+23.2%+3.1 pts+7.5 pts−5.0 pts−0.6 pts
3 years+77.2%+61.4%−7.7 pts−23.6 pts−32.7 pts−48.6 pts
Since launch
FBOT Jun 2023 · ROBO Oct 2013
+54.6%+226.9%−29.1 pts−214.4 pts−54.7 pts−670.3 pts

FBOT and ROBO over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

FBOT
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF · Holds 49 stocks in robotics and automation, 44% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
ROBO
ROBO Global(R) Robotics and Automation Index ETF · Holds 79 stocks in robotics and automation, 23% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Fidelity ROBO Global
Theme Robotics and automation Robotics and automation
In the S&P 500 44.5% 22.6%
Active share vs the S&P 500 85.1% 96.1%
In the Nasdaq-100 22.7% 8.3%
Holdings 49 79
Top ten, share of the fund 41.6% 17.8%
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.95%
Fee for the differing part 0.59% 0.99%
Total return, 1 year +18.8% +23.2%
vs the S&P 500 +3.1 pts +7.5 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −5.0 pts −0.6 pts
Below its high −4.8% −10.9%
Net assets $218m $2.0bn

FBOT and ROBO on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

FBOT in plain words

By weight, 44% of FBOT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 85%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 49 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +18.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 3.1 pts.

ROBO in plain words

By weight, 23% of ROBO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 18% of the fund across 79 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +23.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 7.5 pts. It sits 10.9% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do FBOT and ROBO hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 31% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, FBOT or ROBO?
FBOT has 44% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ROBO has 23%, so ROBO differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, FBOT or ROBO?
FBOT charges 0.50% a year and ROBO charges 0.95%, so FBOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, FBOT against ROBO, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fbot-vs-robo

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.