IBOT vs ROBO: which is really different?

IBOT and ROBO hold 28% of their weight in the same names, and IBOT returned +29.8% over the year. VanEck Robotics ETF and ROBO Global(R) Robotics and Automation Index ETF.

30.8%
IBOT in the S&P 500
22.6%
ROBO in the S&P 500
+29.8%
IBOT total return, 1 year
+23.2%
ROBO total return, 1 year
IBOT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202669% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
69% of its weight is outside the S&P 50031% of IBOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 69% is outside the index31%69%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 91% · top ten 41% of the fund · 65 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 17% in69% of its weight is outside the S&P 50031% of IBOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 69% is outside the index31%69%inoutside the S&P 500active share 91% · top ten 41% of the fund

31% of IBOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 69% is outside the index

ROBO · 1 year to Sep 30, 202677% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
77% of its weight is outside the S&P 50023% of ROBO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 77% is outside the index23%77%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 96% · top ten 18% of the fund · 79 holdings filed Jul 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 8% in77% of its weight is outside the S&P 50023% of ROBO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 77% is outside the index23%77%inoutside the S&P 500active share 96% · top ten 18% of the fund

23% of ROBO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 77% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · ROBO scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IBOT and ROBO hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

28% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IBOT ROBO
Rockwell Automation Inc 3.62% 1.71%
Daifuku Co Ltd 1.72% 1.59%
Autostore Holdings Ltd 1.77% 1.52%
Renishaw Plc 1.58% 1.49%
Abb Ltd 4.70% 1.46%
Symbotic Inc 1.39% 1.65%
Novanta Inc 1.38% 1.53%
Emerson Electric Co 5.61% 1.36%
Kardex Holding Ag 1.34% 1.52%
Autodesk Inc 3.61% 1.07%
Ubtech Robotics Corp Ltd 0.98% 1.10%
Ptc Inc 1.20% 0.97%
Only in IBOT
Keyence Corp 5.66%
Nvidia Corp 5.65%
Asml Holding Nv 5.16%
Fanuc Corp 2.60%
Teledyne Technologies Inc 2.29%
Technipfmc Plc 2.29%
Hexagon Ab 2.03%
Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc 2.02%
Only in ROBO
CELESTICA INC. 2.22%
AIRTAC INTERNATIONAL GROUP 1.94%
Koh Young Technology Inc 1.85%
Infineon Technologies AG 1.84%
HIWIN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 1.83%
Harmonic Drive Systems Inc. 1.79%
FANUC CORPORATION 1.78%
DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.77%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

28% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowIBOTROBOIBOTROBOIBOTROBO
3 months−4.5%−5.8%−7.0 pts−8.3 pts−6.6 pts−7.9 pts
6 months+18.6%+14.7%+1.6 pts−2.3 pts−8.3 pts−12.2 pts
1 year+29.8%+23.2%+14.1 pts+7.5 pts+6.0 pts−0.6 pts
3 years+93.2%+61.4%+8.2 pts−23.6 pts−16.8 pts−48.6 pts
Since launch
IBOT Apr 2023 · ROBO Oct 2013
+99.5%+226.9%+4.8 pts−214.4 pts−37.7 pts−670.3 pts

IBOT and ROBO over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

IBOT
VanEck Robotics ETF · Holds 65 stocks in robotics and automation, 31% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
ROBO
ROBO Global(R) Robotics and Automation Index ETF · Holds 79 stocks in robotics and automation, 23% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer VanEck ROBO Global
Theme Robotics and automation Robotics and automation
In the S&P 500 30.8% 22.6%
Active share vs the S&P 500 90.5% 96.1%
In the Nasdaq-100 17.0% 8.3%
Holdings 65 79
Top ten, share of the fund 41.2% 17.8%
Expense ratio 0.47% 0.95%
Fee for the differing part 0.52% 0.99%
Total return, 1 year +29.8% +23.2%
vs the S&P 500 +14.1 pts +7.5 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 +6.0 pts −0.6 pts
Below its high −6.5% −10.9%
Net assets $103m $2.0bn

IBOT and ROBO on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IBOT in plain words

By weight, 31% of IBOT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 90%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 65 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +29.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 14.1 pts. It sits 6.5% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

ROBO in plain words

By weight, 23% of ROBO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 18% of the fund across 79 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +23.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 7.5 pts. It sits 10.9% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do IBOT and ROBO hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 28% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, IBOT or ROBO?
IBOT has 31% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ROBO has 23%, so ROBO differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, IBOT or ROBO?
IBOT charges 0.47% a year and ROBO charges 0.95%, so IBOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, IBOT against ROBO, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ibot-vs-robo

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.