HUMN vs RTOO: which is really different?

HUMN and RTOO hold 39% of their weight in the same names. Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF and VistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETF.

10.9%
HUMN in the S&P 500
6.1%
RTOO in the S&P 500
−2.8%
HUMN total return, 1 year
−4.4%
RTOO total return, since launch
HUMN · 1 year to Sep 30, 202689% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
89% of its weight is outside the S&P 50011% of HUMN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 89% is outside the index11%89%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 95% · top ten 44% of the fund · 48 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 8% in89% of its weight is outside the S&P 50011% of HUMN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 89% is outside the index11%89%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 95% · top ten 44% of the fund

11% of HUMN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 89% is outside the index

RTOO · since launch to Sep 30, 202694% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
94% of its weight is outside the S&P 5006% of RTOO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 94% is outside the index6%94%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 34% of the fund · 60 holdings filed Oct 1, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 1% in94% of its weight is outside the S&P 5006% of RTOO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 94% is outside the index6%94%6% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 34% of the fund

6% of RTOO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 94% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · RTOO scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HUMN and RTOO hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 1, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

39% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding HUMN RTOO
Harmonic Drive Systems Inc 5.26% 3.55%
Robotis Co Ltd 3.73% 3.27%
Teradyne Inc 2.71% 2.34%
Nabtesco Corp 2.25% 3.70%
Leader Harmonious Drive Systems Co Ltd 2.94% 2.05%
Hiwin Technologies Corp 1.89% 2.01%
China Leadshine Technology Co Ltd 1.86% 2.15%
Doosan Robotics Inc 2.84% 1.82%
UBTech Robotics Corp Ltd 3.96% 1.51%
Vishay Precision Group Inc 1.80% 1.46%
Novanta Inc 1.44% 3.09%
Yaskawa Electric Corp 1.42% 4.28%
Only in HUMN
United States Treasury Bill 10/08/2026 7.62%
YUSHU TECHNOLOGY CO USD-SWAP-GOLD-L 5.56%
Tesla Inc 5.29%
Hyundai Motor Co 2.65%
Hexagon AB 2.62%
ABB Ltd 2.33%
Ouster Inc 2.14%
Churchill Capital Corp XI 1.93%
Only in RTOO
Keyence Corp 3.64%
AutoStore Holdings Ltd 3.43%
FANUC Corp 2.91%
Rockwell Automation Inc 2.91%
SMC Corp 2.69%
Omron Corp 2.56%
Renishaw PLC 2.54%
Siemens AG 2.48%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

39% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowHUMNRTOOHUMNRTOOHUMNRTOO
3 months−16.5%not published−19.0 ptsnot published−18.6 ptsnot published
6 months−0.5%not published−17.4 ptsnot published−27.3 ptsnot published
1 year−2.8%not published−18.6 ptsnot published−26.6 ptsnot published
Since launch
HUMN Jun 2025 · RTOO Jul 2026
+16.0%−4.4%−10.4 pts−6.2 pts−20.3 pts−9.3 pts

HUMN and RTOO over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

HUMN
Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF · Holds 48 stocks in humanoid robots, 11% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
RTOO
VistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETF · Holds 60 stocks in robotics and automation, 6% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Roundhill VistaShares
Theme Humanoid robots Robotics and automation
In the S&P 500 10.9% 6.1%
Active share vs the S&P 500 95.2% 98.9%
In the Nasdaq-100 8.2% 0.9%
Holdings 48 60
Top ten, share of the fund 44.0% 33.5%
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.75%
Fee for the differing part 0.79% 0.76%
Total return, 1 year −2.8% −4.4% (since launch on Jul 16, 2026)
vs the S&P 500 −18.6 pts −6.2 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −26.6 pts −9.3 pts
Below its high −25.4% −10.6%
Net assets $92m $4m

HUMN and RTOO on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

HUMN in plain words

By weight, 11% of HUMN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 48 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −2.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 18.6 pts. It sits 25.4% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

RTOO in plain words

By weight, 6% of RTOO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 34% of the fund across 60 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Since it launched on Jul 16, 2026 the fund returned −4.4% with distributions reinvested against +1.8% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 6.2 pts. It sits 10.6% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do HUMN and RTOO hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 39% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, HUMN or RTOO?
HUMN has 11% of its weight in S&P 500 names and RTOO has 6%, so RTOO differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, HUMN or RTOO?
HUMN charges 0.75% a year and RTOO charges 0.75%, so HUMN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, HUMN against RTOO, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/humn-vs-rtoo

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.