Data as of Nov 12, 2026.
BZZ vs HUMN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Return, fees and overlap, side by side.
Pair scorecard
BZZ costs 0.40 points a year less; HUMN is far larger, $86m against $2.9m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | BZZ | HUMN |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | −7.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 30.1%, high on Jun 2, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Robotics and automation | Humanoid robots |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.75% |
| Net assets | $2.9m | $86m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
38% of BZZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 62% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 12, 2026.
7% of HUMN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 93% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 12, 2026.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BZZ and HUMN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 12, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | ||
|---|---|---|
| Window | BZZ | HUMN |
| 3 months | – | −18.2% |
| 6 months | – | −27.6% |
| 1 year | – | −7.9% |
| Since launch | – | +8.7% |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
BZZ
By weight, 38% of BZZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 29 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 12, 2026.
HUMN
By weight, 7% of HUMN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 46% of the fund across 37 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 12, 2026. Over the year to Nov 12, 2026 the fund returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested. It sits 30.1% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do BZZ and HUMN hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BZZ against HUMN, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bzz-vs-humn
ETFIQ. (Nov 12, 2026). BZZ against HUMN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bzz-vs-humn
[BZZ against HUMN (ETFIQ, Nov 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bzz-vs-humn)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.
BZZ and HUMN hold 0% of their weight in the same names.