HUMN vs IBOT: which is really different?

HUMN and IBOT hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and IBOT returned +29.8% over the year. Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF and VanEck Robotics ETF.

10.9%
HUMN in the S&P 500
30.8%
IBOT in the S&P 500
−2.8%
HUMN total return, 1 year
+29.8%
IBOT total return, 1 year
HUMN · 1 year to Sep 30, 202689% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
89% of its weight is outside the S&P 50011% of HUMN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 89% is outside the index11%89%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 95% · top ten 44% of the fund · 48 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 8% in89% of its weight is outside the S&P 50011% of HUMN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 89% is outside the index11%89%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 95% · top ten 44% of the fund

11% of HUMN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 89% is outside the index

IBOT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202669% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
69% of its weight is outside the S&P 50031% of IBOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 69% is outside the index31%69%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 91% · top ten 41% of the fund · 65 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 17% in69% of its weight is outside the S&P 50031% of IBOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 69% is outside the index31%69%inoutside the S&P 500active share 91% · top ten 41% of the fund

31% of IBOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 69% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · HUMN scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HUMN and IBOT hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.

half

13% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding HUMN IBOT
NVIDIA Corp 2.86% 5.65%
ABB Ltd 2.33% 4.70%
Hexagon AB 2.62% 2.03%
Novanta Inc 1.44% 1.38%
Yaskawa Electric Corp 1.42% 1.29%
UBTech Robotics Corp Ltd 3.96% 0.98%
Teradyne Inc 2.71% 0.69%
Ambarella Inc 1.41% 0.51%
Ouster Inc 2.14% 0.47%
Only in HUMN
United States Treasury Bill 10/08/2026 7.62%
YUSHU TECHNOLOGY CO USD-SWAP-GOLD-L 5.56%
Tesla Inc 5.29%
Harmonic Drive Systems Inc 5.26%
Rainbow Robotics 3.95%
Robotis Co Ltd 3.73%
Leader Harmonious Drive Systems Co Ltd 2.94%
Doosan Robotics Inc 2.84%
Only in IBOT
Keyence Corp 5.66%
Emerson Electric Co 5.61%
Asml Holding Nv 5.16%
Rockwell Automation Inc 3.62%
Autodesk Inc 3.61%
Fanuc Corp 2.60%
Teledyne Technologies Inc 2.29%
Technipfmc Plc 2.29%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

13% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowHUMNIBOTHUMNIBOTHUMNIBOT
3 months−16.5%−4.5%−19.0 pts−7.0 pts−18.6 pts−6.6 pts
6 months−0.5%+18.6%−17.4 pts+1.6 pts−27.3 pts−8.3 pts
1 year−2.8%+29.8%−18.6 pts+14.1 pts−26.6 pts+6.0 pts
3 yearsnot published+93.2%not published+8.2 ptsnot published−16.8 pts
Since launch
HUMN Jun 2025 · IBOT Apr 2023
+16.0%+99.5%−10.4 pts+4.8 pts−20.3 pts−37.7 pts

HUMN and IBOT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

HUMN
Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF · Holds 48 stocks in humanoid robots, 11% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
IBOT
VanEck Robotics ETF · Holds 65 stocks in robotics and automation, 31% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Roundhill VanEck
Theme Humanoid robots Robotics and automation
In the S&P 500 10.9% 30.8%
Active share vs the S&P 500 95.2% 90.5%
In the Nasdaq-100 8.2% 17.0%
Holdings 48 65
Top ten, share of the fund 44.0% 41.2%
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.47%
Fee for the differing part 0.79% 0.52%
Total return, 1 year −2.8% +29.8%
vs the S&P 500 −18.6 pts +14.1 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −26.6 pts +6.0 pts
Below its high −25.4% −6.5%
Net assets $92m $103m

HUMN and IBOT on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

HUMN in plain words

By weight, 11% of HUMN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 48 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −2.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 18.6 pts. It sits 25.4% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

IBOT in plain words

By weight, 31% of IBOT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 90%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 65 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +29.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 14.1 pts. It sits 6.5% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do HUMN and IBOT hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, HUMN or IBOT?
HUMN has 11% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IBOT has 31%, so HUMN differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, HUMN or IBOT?
HUMN charges 0.75% a year and IBOT charges 0.47%, so IBOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, HUMN against IBOT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/humn-vs-ibot

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.