FBOT vs HUMN: which is really different?

FBOT and HUMN hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and FBOT returned +18.8% over the year. Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF.

44.5%
FBOT in the S&P 500
10.9%
HUMN in the S&P 500
+18.8%
FBOT total return, 1 year
−2.8%
HUMN total return, 1 year
FBOT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202656% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
56% of its weight is outside the S&P 50045% of FBOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 56% is outside the index45%56%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 85% · top ten 42% of the fund · 49 holdings filed May 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 23% in56% of its weight is outside the S&P 50045% of FBOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 56% is outside the index45%56%in the S&P 500outside the S&P 500active share 85% · top ten 42% of the fund

45% of FBOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 56% is outside the index

HUMN · 1 year to Sep 30, 202689% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
89% of its weight is outside the S&P 50011% of HUMN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 89% is outside the index11%89%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 95% · top ten 44% of the fund · 48 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 8% in89% of its weight is outside the S&P 50011% of HUMN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 89% is outside the index11%89%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 95% · top ten 44% of the fund

11% of HUMN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 89% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · HUMN scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FBOT and HUMN hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

14% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FBOT HUMN
NVIDIA CORP 4.66% 2.86%
TERADYNE INC 5.94% 2.71%
TESLA INC 1.85% 5.29%
HIWIN TECHNOLOGIES CORP 1.84% 1.89%
HEXAGON AB 1.49% 2.62%
THK CO LTD 3.60% 1.29%
SHENZHEN INOVANCE TECHNOLOGY CO LTD 2.12% 1.23%
ESTUN AUTOMATION CO LTD 0.66% 1.46%
HESAI GROUP 0.53% 1.81%
Only in FBOT
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 6.72%
DEERE and CO 4.32%
AXON ENTERPRISE INC 3.44%
DAIFUKU CO LTD 3.39%
SIEMENS AG 3.19%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC 3.17%
ALPHABET INC 3.16%
KEYENCE CORP 2.67%
Only in HUMN
United States Treasury Bill 10/08/2026 7.62%
YUSHU TECHNOLOGY CO USD-SWAP-GOLD-L 5.56%
Harmonic Drive Systems Inc 5.26%
UBTech Robotics Corp Ltd 3.96%
Rainbow Robotics 3.95%
Robotis Co Ltd 3.73%
Leader Harmonious Drive Systems Co Ltd 2.94%
Doosan Robotics Inc 2.84%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

14% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowFBOTHUMNFBOTHUMNFBOTHUMN
3 months−1.8%−16.5%−4.3 pts−19.0 pts−3.9 pts−18.6 pts
6 months+14.9%−0.5%−2.0 pts−17.4 pts−11.9 pts−27.3 pts
1 year+18.8%−2.8%+3.1 pts−18.6 pts−5.0 pts−26.6 pts
3 years+77.2%not published−7.7 ptsnot published−32.7 ptsnot published
Since launch
FBOT Jun 2023 · HUMN Jun 2025
+54.6%+16.0%−29.1 pts−10.4 pts−54.7 pts−20.3 pts

FBOT and HUMN over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

FBOT
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF · Holds 49 stocks in robotics and automation, 44% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
HUMN
Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF · Holds 48 stocks in humanoid robots, 11% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Fidelity Roundhill
Theme Robotics and automation Humanoid robots
In the S&P 500 44.5% 10.9%
Active share vs the S&P 500 85.1% 95.2%
In the Nasdaq-100 22.7% 8.2%
Holdings 49 48
Top ten, share of the fund 41.6% 44.0%
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.75%
Fee for the differing part 0.59% 0.79%
Total return, 1 year +18.8% −2.8%
vs the S&P 500 +3.1 pts −18.6 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −5.0 pts −26.6 pts
Below its high −4.8% −25.4%
Net assets $218m $92m

FBOT and HUMN on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

FBOT in plain words

By weight, 44% of FBOT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 85%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 49 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +18.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 3.1 pts.

HUMN in plain words

By weight, 11% of HUMN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 48 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −2.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 18.6 pts. It sits 25.4% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do FBOT and HUMN hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, FBOT or HUMN?
FBOT has 44% of its weight in S&P 500 names and HUMN has 11%, so HUMN differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, FBOT or HUMN?
FBOT charges 0.50% a year and HUMN charges 0.75%, so FBOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, FBOT against HUMN, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fbot-vs-humn

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.