BATT vs DRIV: which is really different?

BATT and DRIV hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and DRIV returned +17.9% over the year. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF.

15.6%
BATT in the S&P 500
29.7%
DRIV in the S&P 500
+12.1%
BATT total return, 1 year
+17.9%
DRIV total return, 1 year
BATT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202684% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
84% of its weight is outside the S&P 50016% of BATT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index16%84%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 47% of the fund · 57 holdings filed Oct 1, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 8% in84% of its weight is outside the S&P 50016% of BATT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index16%84%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 47% of the fund

16% of BATT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index

DRIV · 1 year to Sep 30, 202670% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
70% of its weight is outside the S&P 50030% of DRIV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 70% is outside the index30%70%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 86% · top ten 28% of the fund · 90 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 20% in70% of its weight is outside the S&P 50030% of DRIV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 70% is outside the index30%70%inoutside the S&P 500active share 86% · top ten 28% of the fund

30% of DRIV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 70% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · BATT scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BATT and DRIV hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 1, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

15% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding BATT DRIV
Tesla Inc 7.73% 2.84%
Bloom Energy Corp 5.25% 1.92%
Samsung SDI Co Ltd 2.47% 1.59%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA 1.44% 1.10%
EnerSys 1.33% 1.08%
Albemarle Corp 1.56% 1.06%
IGO LTD 1.04% 1.06%
PLS Group Ltd 1.33% 1.00%
NIO Inc 1.02% 0.83%
AUSTRALIAN DOLLAR 0.05% -0.00%
Only in BATT
BHP Group Ltd 6.90%
Freeport-McMoRan Inc 6.32%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd 5.37%
BYD Co Ltd 4.47%
Grupo Mexico SAB de CV 3.04%
TDK Corp 2.86%
Teck Resources Ltd 2.64%
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co Ltd 1.95%
Only in DRIV
MICROSOFT CORP 4.09%
INTEL CORP 3.69%
NVIDIA CORP 3.38%
ALPHABET INC-CL A 2.93%
QUALCOMM INC 2.75%
TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 2.52%
RIO TINTO PLC 1.80%
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS INC 1.79%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

15% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowBATTDRIVBATTDRIVBATTDRIV
3 months−6.7%−12.4%−9.2 pts−14.9 pts−8.8 pts−14.5 pts
6 months−4.9%+7.4%−21.9 pts−9.6 pts−31.8 pts−19.5 pts
1 year+12.1%+17.9%−3.6 pts+2.2 pts−11.7 pts−5.9 pts
3 years+37.5%+47.3%−47.5 pts−37.7 pts−72.5 pts−62.7 pts
Since launch
BATT Jun 2018 · DRIV Apr 2018
−15.2%+142.1%−228.1 pts−79.2 pts−359.8 pts−228.7 pts

BATT and DRIV over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF · Holds 57 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF · Holds 90 stocks in electric vehicles and batteries, 30% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Amplify Global X
Theme Lithium and battery metals Electric vehicles and batteries
In the S&P 500 15.6% 29.7%
Active share vs the S&P 500 98.0% 85.9%
In the Nasdaq-100 7.7% 19.7%
Holdings 57 90
Top ten, share of the fund 47.1% 27.7%
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.68%
Fee for the differing part 0.60% 0.79%
Total return, 1 year +12.1% +17.9%
vs the S&P 500 −3.6 pts +2.2 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −11.7 pts −5.9 pts
Below its high −20.7% −22.0%
Net assets $112m $361m

BATT and DRIV on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BATT in plain words

By weight, 16% of BATT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 57 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 3.6 pts. It sits 20.7% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.

DRIV in plain words

By weight, 30% of DRIV's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 28% of the fund across 90 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 2.2 pts. It sits 22.0% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do BATT and DRIV hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 15% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BATT or DRIV?
BATT has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and DRIV has 30%, so BATT differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BATT or DRIV?
BATT charges 0.59% a year and DRIV charges 0.68%, so BATT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, BATT against DRIV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/batt-vs-driv

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.